People v. Rockefeller

Decision Date30 December 2010
Citation79 A.D.3d 1527,913 N.Y.S.2d 417
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Michael ROCKEFELLER, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Leyla A. Kiosse, Albany, for appellant.

P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Steven M. Sharp of counsel), for respondent.

Before: MERCURE, J.P., MALONE JR., STEIN, McCARTHY and EGAN JR., JJ.

MALONE JR., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (Breslin, J.), rendered August 12, 2009, which revoked defendant's probation and imposed a sentence of imprisonment.

Defendant was charged in an indictment with making a terroristic threat and aggravated harassment in the second degree after he threatened to murder an Assistant District Attorney in the Rensselaer County District Attorney's office. In June 2008, he pleaded guilty to attempted making a terroristic threat and was sentenced to five years of probation. Less than a year later, defendant was arrested and charged with similar crimes-making a terroristic threat, stalking in the third degree and aggravated harassment in the second degree-arising out of death threats made to an investigator for the Rensselaer County District Attorney's office, as well as to the investigator's immediate family. Thereafter, defendant was charged with violating the condition of his probation that prohibited him from violating any federal, state or local laws. Following a hearing, County Court terminated defendant's probation and sentenced him to 1 1/3 to 4 years in prison. Defendant appeals and we affirm.

A probation violation must be established by a preponderance of the evidence ( see CPL 410.70[3]; People v. Cruz, 35 A.D.3d 898, 899, 824 N.Y.S.2d 808 [2006], lv. denied 8 N.Y.3d 845, 830 N.Y.S.2d 704, 862 N.E.2d 796 [2007] ). Here, defendant's probation officer testified that defendant informed her that he was going to beat the investigator and that the investigator "should hope that he doesn't die from his beatings." The Rensselaer County District Attorney testified that defendant said to him, "[Y]our investigator ... is a dead man." The investigator testified that he began receiving threatening phone calls in August 2008 and that, although defendant identified himself by name on only one occasion, the investigator always recognized defendant's voice because the two had spoken with one another more than 100 times. According to the investigator,defendant threatened his life during every...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • People v. Simpson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 16, 2017
    ...and citations omitted]; see CPL 410.70 [3 ]; People v. Beauvais, 101 A.D.3d 1488, 1489, 955 N.Y.S.2d 898 [2012] ; People v. Rockefeller, 79 A.D.3d 1527, 1527, 913 N.Y.S.2d 417 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 862, 923 N.Y.S.2d 424, 947 N.E.2d 1203 [2011] ). "Hearsay evidence is admissible and m......
  • People v. Dudley
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 8, 2012
    ...by a preponderance of the evidence ( see People v. McQuality, 95 A.D.3d 1369, 1370, 943 N.Y.S.2d 305 [2012];People v. Rockefeller, 79 A.D.3d 1527, 913 N.Y.S.2d 417 [2010],lv. denied16 N.Y.3d 862, 923 N.Y.S.2d 424, 947 N.E.2d 1203 [2011] ). We reject defendant's contention that the court's d......
  • People v. Bevilacqua
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • January 19, 2012
    ...of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant violated a term of his probation ( see CPL 410.70[3]; People v. Rockefeller, 79 A.D.3d 1527, 1527, 913 N.Y.S.2d 417 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 862, 923 N.Y.S.2d 424, 947 N.E.2d 1203 [2011] ). Probation violation hearings are sum......
  • People v. Jordan
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 30, 2017
    ...A.D.3d 1107, 1108, 875 N.Y.S.2d 602 [2009] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see CPL 410.70[3] ; People v. Rockefeller, 79 A.D.3d 1527, 1527, 913 N.Y.S.2d 417 [2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 862, 923 N.Y.S.2d 424, 947 N.E.2d 1203 [2011] ). Here, the probation officer overseeing......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT