People v. Rodriguez
Decision Date | 19 August 2020 |
Docket Number | Ind. No. 929/17,2018–13778 |
Citation | 186 A.D.3d 749,127 N.Y.S.3d 288 (Mem) |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Joe RODRIGUEZ, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Bruce R. Bekritsky, Mineola, NY, for appellant.
Madeline Singas, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Tammy J. Smiley and Matthew C. Frankel of counsel), for respondent.
MARK C. DILLON, J.P., SHERI S. ROMAN, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, BETSY BARROS, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER ON MOTION
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Robert A. Schwartz, J.), rendered September 8, 2017, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree and criminal possession of a firearm, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, in which he moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.
ORDERED that new counsel shall serve and file a brief on behalf of the appellant within 90 days of the date of this decision and order on motion, and the respondent shall serve and file its brief within 30 days after the brief on behalf of the appellant is served and filed. By prior decision and order on motion of this Court dated April 30, 2019, the appellant was granted leave to prosecute the appeal as a poor person, with the appeal to be heard on the original papers, including a certified transcript of the proceedings, and on the briefs of the parties. The parties are directed to file one original and five duplicate hard copies, and one digital copy, of their respective briefs, and to serve one hard copy on each other (see 22 NYCRR 1250.9 [a][4]; [c][1] ).
In reviewing an attorney's motion to be relieved pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493, this Court must first " ‘satisfy itself that the attorney has provided the client with a diligent and thorough search of the record for any arguable claim that might support the client's appeal’ " ( Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 A.D.3d 252, 255, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676, quoting Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 ). "[C]ounsel must, at a minimum, draw the Court's attention to the relevant evidence, with specific references to the record; identify and assess the efficacy of any significant objections, applications, or motions; and identify possible issues for appeal, with reference to the facts of the case and relevant legal authority" ( Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.] , 89 A.D.3d at 255, 931 N.Y.S.2d 676 ).
The brief submitted by the appellant's counsel pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 is deficient. It does not address, inter alia, the colloquy regarding the defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal, or address whether the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v. McCalla , 160 A.D.3d 662, 663, 74 N.Y.S.3d 307 ; People v. Ferretti , 148 A.D.3d 720, 721, 47 N.Y.S.3d 736 ; People v. Swenson , 130 A.D.3d 848, 849, 12 N.Y.S.3d 557 ; People v. Sedita , 113 A.D.3d 638, 639–640, 978 N.Y.S.2d 318 ; cf. People v. Murray , 169 A.D.3d 227, 93 N.Y.S.3d 694 ). Since the defendant did...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Campbell
...voluntarily, and intelligently, or the appellant's responses to any of those advisements and inquiries (see People v. Rodriguez, 186 A.D.3d 749, 750, 127 N.Y.S.3d 288 ; People v. Campbell, 183 A.D.3d 599, 121 N.Y.S.3d 636 ; People v. Delarosa, 162 A.D.3d 787, 789, 79 N.Y.S.3d 67 ; People v.......
-
People v. Campbell
... ... he was waiving or the inquiries made of the appellant to ... ensure that the pleas were entered knowingly, voluntarily, ... and intelligently, or the appellant's responses to any of ... those advisements and inquiries (see People v ... Rodriguez, 186 A.D.3d 749, 750; People v ... Campbell, 183 A.D.3d 599; People v Delarosa, ... 162 A.D.3d 787, 789; People v Johnson, 126 A.D.3d ... 916, 917; People v Sedita, 113 A.D.3d 638, 639). In ... addition, the brief fails to provide any details regarding ... the ... ...
- People v. Reed
-
People v. Passantino
...or operates for a period of three years was excessive (see People v. London, 198 A.D.3d at 922, 152 N.Y.S.3d 845 ; People v. Rodriguez, 186 A.D.3d 749, 750, 127 N.Y.S.3d 288 ). BARROS, J.P., RIVERA, CHAMBERS and WOOTEN, JJ., ...