People v. Rodriguez

Decision Date28 February 1977
Citation391 N.Y.S.2d 992,56 A.D.2d 665
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Louie RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

William E. Hellerstein and William J. Gallagher, New York City (Judith Preble, New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Eugene Gold, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Helman R. Brook, Brooklyn, of counsel, Jay M. Cohen, Brooklyn, on the brief), for respondent.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered September 23, 1974, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. No opinion.

HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and COHALAN, RABIN and TITONE, JJ., concur.

MARTUSCELLO, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and grant defendant's motion for leave to withdraw his plea of guilty, with the following memorandum:

Defendant made the following statements at the plea taking. He was an unemployed musician whose wife and son were compelled to return to her family because he was unable to support them. His former booking agent induced him, by repeated promises of work, to take the booking agent's 'cousin' (the undercover agent) to a certain barbershop to purchase cocaine. He merely accompanied the undercover agent to the barbershop, vouched that the agent was not a police officer and waited while the agent made the purchase. Following this statement, the court informed the defendant that he had admitted commission of the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and accepted his plea of guilty to that offense. At the sentencing, the defendant, who had had no previous experience or conflict in a criminal court, sought to withdraw his plea. He stated that he had never been involved in drug dealings, that he had been persuaded to plead guilty by the court's statements that it was time to bring the case to trial, by the prosecutor's statement that the offer of the plea would be withdrawn upon the selection of a jury, by the entrance of the jury panel into the courtroom, and by his fears, which were based upon his having heard that everyone who stands trial is found guilty, regardless of guilt or innocence, and sentenced to prison for 15 years to life. In my opinion, on this record, the defendant's plea should not have been accepted. His statements at the plea taking indicate that he may not have been guilty of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Perkins
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 7, 1982
    ...where, as here, defendant was actively represented by counsel and made no effort to withdraw the plea (see People v. Rodriguez, 56 A.D.2d 665, 391 N.Y.S.2d 992, affd. 43 N.Y.2d 860, 403 N.Y.S.2d 220, 374 N.E.2d 131; People v. Colon, 77 A.D.2d 370, 433 N.Y.S.2d 766; People v. Agurto, 70 A.D.......
  • People v. Rodriguez
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 1978
  • People v. Ramos
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 28, 1977

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT