People v. Rosemond
| Decision Date | 23 January 1987 |
| Citation | 126 A.D.2d 962,511 N.Y.S.2d 736 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Wayne D. ROSEMOND, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Gerald T. Barth by Theodore Stenuf, Syracuse, for appellant.
Richard Hennessy by Maureen MacPherson, Syracuse, for respondent.
Before DILLON, P.J., and CALLAHAN, BOOMER, GREEN and LAWTON, JJ.
We have reviewed all the issues presented on appeal and find them to be without merit. Among the issues raised, defendant contends that the prosecutor made prejudicial remarks during his summation. As there was no objection made by defense counsel during the summation, the alleged prejudicial statements were not preserved for appellate review (People v. Balls, 69 N.Y.2d 641, 511 N.Y.S.2d 586, 503 N.E.2d 1017). In any event, the remarks were not a part of a pervasive pattern of misconduct, and defendant was not thereby deprived of his right to a fair trial (People v. Galloway, 54 N.Y.2d 396, 446 N.Y.S.2d 9, 430 N.E.2d 885; People v. Demming, 116 A.D.2d 886, 498 N.Y.S.2d 203).
Judgment unanimously affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
De Vito v. Katsch
... ... § 388(1) ]; People v. Brown, 158 A.D.2d 461, 550 N.Y.S.2d 913; Matter of Mortillaro v. Posner, 147 A.D.2d 701, 538 N.Y.S.2d 311), and non-waivable (People v. Klein, 7 ... ...
- People v. Dawkins
-
People v. Mitchell
...104 A.D.2d 695, 480 N.Y.S.2d 579). The claimed instances of prosecutorial misconduct do not warrant reversal (see, People v. Rosemond, 126 A.D.2d 962, 511 N.Y.S.2d 736, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 886, 515 N.Y.S.2d 1034, 507 N.E.2d 1104; People v. Mott, 94 A.D.2d 415, 465 N.Y.S.2d 307). The summat......
- People v. Dunn