People v. Rossetti

Decision Date30 May 2012
Citation2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 04197,944 N.Y.S.2d 911,95 A.D.3d 1362
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Raymond ROSSETTI, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Terry D. Horner, Poughkeepsie, N.Y., for appellant.

Adam B. Levy, District Attorney, Carmel, N.Y. (Mary Jane MacCrae of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the County Court, Putnam County (Reitz, J.), imposed December 2, 2008, upon remittitur from this Court ( see People v. Rossetti, 55 A.D.3d 637, 865 N.Y.S.2d 318), upon his convictions of assault in the first degree and driving while intoxicated, upon his plea of guilty.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the contention of the defendant, the County Court, which, upon remittitur, had the “discretion” to “afford” him “an opportunity to withdraw his plea” ( People v. Rossetti, 55 A.D.3d 637, 637, 865 N.Y.S.2d 318), properly denied his request to withdraw his plea of guilty. A defendant's request to withdraw a plea of guilty should “not be granted merely for the asking” ( People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 485, 743 N.Y.S.2d 45, 769 N.E.2d 802), and the defendant, whose plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made ( see People v. Harris, 61 N.Y.2d 9, 17, 471 N.Y.S.2d 61, 459 N.E.2d 170), failed to articulate a persuasive reason warranting vacatur of the plea.

SKELOS, J.P., FLORIO, ROMAN and MILLER, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Washington
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 17, 2013
    ... ... People v. Alexander, 97 N.Y.2d 482, 485, 743 N.Y.S.2d 45, 769 N.E.2d 802 [a defendant may not withdraw a guilty plea merely for the asking]; People v. Rossetti, 95 A.D.3d 1362, 944 N.Y.S.2d 911 [same] ). Under the rule announced today, a defendant is not only given the right to consult with an attorney after making a decision to submit to a chemical BAC test, the defendant is also given the right to reconsider and revoke a previous valid consent. In my ... ...
  • Medina v. Sing Sing Corr. Facility
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 30, 2012

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT