People v. Ruiz
| Decision Date | 29 April 1996 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Luis RUIZ, a/k/a Luis Alvarado, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Susan Bloch Marhoffer, White Plains, for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn (Roseann B. MacKechnie and Monique Ferrell, of counsel), for respondent.
Before MANGANO, P.J., and RITTER, HART and McGINITY, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Firetog, J.), rendered September 13, 1994, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
On February 3, 1994, the defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree to cover the indictment. He was promised a sentence of two to four years imprisonment, "concurrent with the time you are now serving". On February 14, 1994, he received the promised sentence.
By letter dated April 4, 1994, the Department of Correctional Services informed the sentencing court that the sentence was illegal under Penal Law § 70.25(2-a). On June 13, 1994, the defendant appeared before the sentencing court, who informed him that "we imposed an illegal sentence", and gave the defendant the option of being resentenced to two to four years imprisonment to run consecutive to his prior sentence, or withdrawing his plea and going to trial. The defendant did not object to that procedure and chose to withdraw his guilty plea.
On this appeal from the judgment of conviction rendered after trial, the defendant contends that the court improperly vacated his guilty plea. His contentions are unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05[2] ). In any event, the court's power to correct an illegal sentence within one year after the sentence was imposed is well recognized in statutory and case law (see, People v. Wright, 56 N.Y.2d 613, 450 N.Y.S.2d 473, 435 N.E.2d 1088; People v. Ford, 143 A.D.2d 522, 533 N.Y.S.2d 35; People v. Smith, 164 Misc.2d 306, 624 N.Y.S.2d 792; CPL 440.40[1]; cf., People v. Riggins, 164 A.D.2d 797, 559 N.Y.S.2d 535). In the instant case, where the defendant pleaded guilty with the understanding that he would receive a sentence which the court and the parties later ascertained was illegal, the court was obligated to give the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Leeper
...in order to correct an illegal sentence that it had previously imposed (see People v DeValle, 94 N.Y.2d 870, 871; see also People v Ruiz, 226 A.D.2d 747, 748, lv denied 88 N.Y.2d 969). Defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (Penal Law ......
-
People v. Moss
...73 N.Y.2d 445, 450, 541 N.Y.S.2d 737, 539 N.E.2d 565; see also, People v. Wright, supra; People v. Minaya, supra; People v. Ruiz, 226 A.D.2d 747, 641 N.Y.S.2d 692 ; People v. Riggins, 164 A.D.2d 797, 559 N.Y.S.2d 535). Here, because the original sentence was that which was promised and inte......
-
People v. Alvarado
...718 647 N.Y.S.2d 718 88 N.Y.2d 964, 670 N.E.2d 1350 People v. Luis Alvarado Court of Appeals of New York July 09, 1996 Smith, J. 226 A.D.2d 747, 641 N.Y.S.2d 692 App.Div. 2, Kings Denied. ...
-
People v. Dabbs
...to the Supreme Court, Westchester County, to give the defendant the option to withdraw his plea or receive a legal sentence (see, People v Ruiz, 226 A.D.2d 747; People v Ford, 143 A.D.2d RITTER, J.P., KRAUSMAN, FLORLO and FEUERSTEIN, JJ., concur. ...