People v. Rumble

CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtBREITEL
CitationPeople v. Rumble, 45 N.Y.2d 879, 410 N.Y.S.2d 806, 383 N.E.2d 108 (N.Y. 1978)
Decision Date24 October 1978
Parties, 383 N.E.2d 108 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jeffrey H. RUMBLE, Appellant.

BREITEL, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
59 cases
  • RR Village Ass'n, Inc. v. Denver Sewer Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • August 26, 1987
  • Norwood v. Artis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of New York
    • April 26, 2007
    ...the actual victim, it is nonetheless a relevant admission of guilt and constitutes direct evidence.5 People v. Rumble, 45 N.Y.2d 879, 880-81, 410 N.Y.S.2d 806, 383 N.E.2d 108 "(N.Y.1978); People v. Rutledge, 286 A.D.2d 962, 962, 730 N.Y.S.2d 761 (App. Div. 4th Dept. 2001); People v. Major, ......
  • People v. Silburn
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 2018
    ...illness, his statements, which are direct evidence of guilt, must be rejected by the jury (see e.g. People v. Rumble, 45 N.Y.2d 879, 880–881, 410 N.Y.S.2d 806, 383 N.E.2d 108 [1978] ).Moreover, our prior case law demonstrates that we have repeatedly construed the statute broadly in order to......
  • People v. Quartararo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 31, 1994
    ...they do constitute direct evidence (e.g., People v. Licitra, 47 N.Y.2d 554, 419 N.Y.S.2d 461, 393 N.E.2d 456; People v. Rumble, 45 N.Y.2d 879, 881, 410 N.Y.S.2d 806, 383 N.E.2d 108; People v. Basir, 179 A.D.2d 662, 578 N.Y.S.2d 603; People v. Medina, 120 A.D.2d 749, 750, 502 N.Y.S.2d 792). ......
  • Get Started for Free