People v. Rykaczewski
| Decision Date | 02 June 1986 |
| Citation | 121 A.D.2d 409,502 N.Y.S.2d 808 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Gregory RYKACZEWSKI, a/k/a Gregory Rykezewski, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Michael A. Gross, of counsel), for appellant.
Elizabeth Holtzman, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Barbara D. Underwood, Peter A. Weinstein and Michael Gore, of counsel), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and RUBIN, LAWRENCE and KUNZEMAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Pincus, J.), rendered December 15, 1983, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree (four counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress a statement made by him to the police.
Judgment affirmed.
Under the totality of circumstances, Criminal Term proper found that the defendant's confession was not involuntary as a matter of law. We find the contentions raised by the defendant to be unpersuasive. Although the defendant's breath had the odor of alcohol, the evidence did not indicate that he was intoxicated to the point of rendering his confession involuntary (see, People v. Schompert, 19 N.Y.2d 300, 279 N.Y.S.2d 515, 226 N.E.2d 305, cert. denied 389 U.S. 874, 88 S.Ct. 164, 19 L.Ed.2d 157). Moreover, the entire period of questioning lasted only 45 minutes, a period of time which is not, in itself, conducive to eliciting a false or involuntary statement (see, People v. Perry, 77 A.D.2d 269, 433 N.Y.S.2d 138). Further, the statement made by the detective questioning the defendant, to the effect that if the defendant told the truth the detective would speak to the District Attorney on his behalf, is not the type of encouragement which is constitutionally prohibited (see, People v. Perry, supra; People v. White, 63 A.D.2d 752, 404 N.Y.S.2d 894).
Nor do we find merit to the defendant's contention that the court improperly denied his request to charge criminally negligent homicide as a lesser included offense. There was no reasonable view of the evidence which would have supported a conviction of the lesser but not the greater offense (see, People v. Henderson, 41 N.Y.2d 233, 391 N.Y.S.2d 563, 359 N.E.2d 1357; People v. Ivisic, 95 A.D.2d 307, 466 N.Y.S.2d 421).
The other contentions raised by the defendant have been examined and found to be meritless.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Provosty
...450; People v. Zito, 123 A.D.2d 799, 507 N.Y.S.2d 273, lv. denied 69 N.Y.2d 835, 513 N.Y.S.2d 1043, 506 N.E.2d 554; People v. Rykaczewski, 121 A.D.2d 409, 502 N.Y.S.2d 808, lv. denied 68 N.Y.2d 917, 508 N.Y.S.2d 1038, 501 N.E.2d 611). The totality of the circumstances shows that the defenda......
-
People v. Belgenio
...as a direct or an implied promise of leniency (see, People v. Weisbrot, 124 A.D.2d 762, 508 N.Y.S.2d 481; People v. Rykaczewski, 121 A.D.2d 409, 410, 502 N.Y.S.2d 808; People v. Perry, 77 A.D.2d 269, 433 N.Y.S.2d 138; see also, People v. Sumeriski, 119 A.D.2d 999, 500 N.Y.S.2d 900). Nor was......
-
People v. Benitez
...voluntary waiver of his Miranda rights (see, People v. Williams, 62 N.Y.2d 285, 476 N.Y.S.2d 788, 465 N.E.2d 327; People v. Rykaczewski, 121 A.D.2d 409, 502 N.Y.S.2d 808; People v. Gloskey, 105 A.D.2d 871, 482 N.Y.S.2d 82; People v. Baez, 79 A.D.2d 608, 433 N.Y.S.2d 489). The fact that appr......
-
People v. Weisbrot
...made aware of the defendant's cooperation, without more, is insufficient to render the statements involuntary (see, People v. Rykaczewski, 121 A.D.2d 409, 502 N.Y.S.2d 808 People v. Perry, 77 A.D.2d 269, 433 N.Y.S.2d 138). Nor does the fact that the police officers suggested to the defendan......