People v. Sain

Decision Date10 May 1999
Citation261 A.D.2d 488,691 N.Y.S.2d 64
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>JOSEPH SAIN, Appellant.

Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The determination as to whether to allow a defendant to withdraw a previously-entered plea of guilty rests within the sound discretion of the sentencing court. Only in rare instances will a defendant be entitled to an evidentiary hearing upon a motion to withdraw a plea of guilty (see, CPL 220.60 [3]; People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520, 524; People v Tinsley, 35 NY2d 926, 927; People v Santana, 176 AD2d 360). The County Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defendant's motion to withdraw his plea without conducting a hearing.

The defendant's contention that the indictment was jurisdictionally defective because the Grand Jury which heard the case voted an indictment after its term had expired is based on matters which are dehors the record.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Sain
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • October 1, 1999

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT