People v. Samora, 26304
| Decision Date | 17 March 1975 |
| Docket Number | No. 26304,26304 |
| Citation | 188 Colo. 74,532 P.2d 946 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ernest SAMORA, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
J. E. Losavio, Jr., Dist. Atty., Cecil Turner, Asst. Dist. Atty., David E. Ware, Asst. Dist. Atty., Pueblo, for plaintiff-appellant.
Laurence A. Ardell, Pueblo, for defendant-appellee.
Defendant was charged with first-degree arson and conspiracy to commit first-degree arson. These crimes were allegedly committed by the defendant and one Gettler in the Pueblo County Jail where they were being held in custody on other matters. The jury found the defendant not guilty of arson, but guilty of conspiracy. The trial court granted the defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal on the conspiracy charge in reliance on Robles v. People, 160 Colo. 297, 417 P.2d 232 (1966). The district attorney then perfected this appeal. We affirm.
Robles announced the rule that acquittal of a substantive offense forecloses conviction on a conspiracy charge if, and only if, the evidence relied upon the establish the existence of the conspiracy was also the only evidence used to prove the substantive offense. This rule, reaffirmed repeatedly by this court, is now embodied in statutory law. Section 18--2--206, C.R.S. 1973. People v. Incerto, 180 Colo. 366, 505 P.2d 1309 (1973); Feltes v. People, 178 Colo. 409, 498 P.2d 1128 (1972).
Upon granting the defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal, the trial court ruled that the only evidence of any conspiracy to commit first-degree arson was the same evidence which the jury found to be insufficient to support a guilty verdict on the substantive offense. The district attorney argues on this appeal that the conspiracy conviction is supported by independent evidence and that the trial court therefore committed error in granting the motion for judgment of acquittal.
From our review of the record, we note that evidence presented at trial as to the defendant's participation was not substantial, and as the case unfolded before the jury, it seemed unlikely that the defendant was involved in the crimes as charged. We have also noted that the only so-called independent evidence from which it might be inferred that the defendant was a participant in a conspiracy was vague and inconclusive. Such evidence is totally insufficient to support the defendant's conviction on the conspiracy charge after his acquittal on the substantive charge of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Garcia
...appellant that there is a growing body of case law to the contrary. See DeSacia v. State, 469 P.2d 369 (Alaska 1970); People v. Samora, 188 Colo. 74, 532 P.2d 946 (1975); People v. Armijio, 176 Colo. 547, 491 P.2d 1384 (1971); Robles v. People, 160 Colo. 297, 417 P.2d 232 (1966). See also, ......
-
People v. Moody
...in jeopardy a second time for the same offense. Section 16-12-102, C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl.Vol. 8); C.A.R. 4(b); cf. People v. Samora, 188 Colo. 74, 532 P.2d 946 (1975) (such appeals should be avoided in cases that do not involve egregious error by the trial court).2 Section 18-4-402, C.R.S.1......
-
People v. Fagerholm, 86SA455
...therefore not appropriate for our review pursuant to section 16-12-102(1), 8A C.R.S. (1986), and C.A.R. 4(b)(2). See People v. Samora, 188 Colo. 74, 532 P.2d 946 (1975). III For the foregoing reasons, we approve the ruling of the trial VOLLACK, J., dissents. VOLLACK, Justice, dissenting: I ......
-
People v. Albers, 28022
...Section 18-2-206(2), C.R.S.1973 (Emphasis added.) See also, e. g., People v. Berry, Colo., 550 P.2d 332 (1976); People v. Samora, 188 Colo. 74, 532 P.2d 946 (1975); People v. Coca, 185 Colo. 10, 521 P.2d 781 In this case, contrary to the appellant's assertions, there is ample evidence of co......
-
From the Wool-sack
...Seven officials at University of Southern Colo. at Pueblo were indicted by the grand jury for malfeasance in office. 2. People v. Samora, 532 P.2d 946 (1975). 3. People v. Chmielewski, 529 P.2d 1337 (1975). 4. People v. Mussel, 561 P.2d 1259 (1977). 964 965 966 967 (c) 1978 The Colorado Law......