People v. Sancho-Hernandez
| Decision Date | 08 May 2013 |
| Citation | 965 N.Y.S.2d 526,2013 N.Y. Slip Op. 03349,106 A.D.3d 841 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Hector SANCHO–HERNANDEZ, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Carol Kahn, New York, N.Y., for appellant.
William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, SANDRA L. SGROI, and JEFFREY A. COHEN, JJ.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Hayes, J.), rendered November 29, 2010, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record supports the County Court's finding that the defendant was arrested in the public hallway outside of his apartment. In addition, the hearing evidence demonstrates that the defendant voluntarily left his apartment and was not coerced into doing so by the arresting officers. Consequently, the arrest of the defendant was not in violation of Payton v. New York, 445 U.S. 573, 100 S.Ct. 1371, 63 L.Ed.2d 639. Accordingly, the court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress his statements to law enforcement officials as the fruit of an illegal arrest ( see People v. Cameron, 74 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 905 N.Y.S.2d 619;People v. Morales, 250 A.D.2d 782, 783, 671 N.Y.S.2d 1009;see also People v. Johnson, 82 A.D.3d 1624, 918 N.Y.S.2d 922).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v. Farrar, 52 N.Y.2d 302, 305, 437 N.Y.S.2d 961, 419 N.E.2d 864;People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 83–85, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675;see also People v. Turnbull, 52 A.D.3d 747, 860 N.Y.S.2d 189).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Poinvil
...on the second floor (see People v. Minley, 68 N.Y.2d 952, 953–954, 510 N.Y.S.2d 87, 502 N.E.2d 1002 [1986] ; People v. Sancho–Hernandez, 106 A.D.3d 841, 965 N.Y.S.2d 526 [2013] ; People v. Jaramillo, 97 A.D.3d 1146, 1147–1148, 947 N.Y.S.2d 876 [2012] ; People v. Nielsen, 89 A.D.3d 1041, 104......
-
People v. Granger
...781 N.Y.S.2d 284, 814 N.E.2d 456 ; People v. Minley, 68 N.Y.2d 952, 953, 510 N.Y.S.2d 87, 502 N.E.2d 1002 ; People v. Sancho–Hernandez, 106 A.D.3d 841, 841, 965 N.Y.S.2d 526 ; People v. Cameron, 74 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 905 N.Y.S.2d 619 ; People v. Allen, 54 A.D.3d 868, 868–869, 865 N.Y.S.2d 2......
-
People v. Granger
...821, 781 N.Y.S.2d 284, 814 N.E.2d 456; People v. Minley, 68 N.Y.2d 952, 953, 510 N.Y.S.2d 87, 502 N.E.2d 1002; People v. Sancho–Hernandez, 106 A.D.3d 841, 841, 965 N.Y.S.2d 526; People v. Cameron, 74 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 905 N.Y.S.2d 619; People v. Allen, 54 A.D.3d 868, 868–869, 865 N.Y.S.2d ......
- People v. Sweeney