People v. Sanders

Decision Date30 July 1990
Citation163 A.D.2d 616,559 N.Y.S.2d 681
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Willie SANDERS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Stephen Kolnik, New Rochelle, for appellant. Carl A. Vergari, Dist. Atty. (James A. Randazzo and Richard Longworth Hecht, White Plains, of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal

by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.), rendered August 10, 1988, convicting him of sodomy in the first degree (two counts), upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed. At sentencing, the court issued an order of protection with respect to the two infant victims of the defendant. The defendant did not object to the issuance of this order, noting that he understood its terms; nor did he seek to withdraw his guilty plea. Under the circumstances, the defendant's challenge to the issuance of the order of protection is not preserved for appellate review (CPL 470.05[2]; see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636, 467 N.Y.S.2d 355, 454 N.E.2d 938). In any event, we find that the order was properly issued (see, CPL 530.13).

BRACKEN, J.P., and LAWRENCE, EIBER, HARWOOD and ROSENBLATT, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • People v. Sanders
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 18 October 1990
  • People v. Warren
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 10 January 2001
    ...of conviction, his challenge to the issuance of the order of protection has not been preserved for our review (see generally, People v Sanders, 163 A.D.2d 616, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 944). As to the scope of the order of protection, which includes defendant's two biological daughters, we find ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT