People v. Satloff
| Decision Date | 13 May 1982 |
| Citation | 452 N.Y.S.2d 12,56 N.Y.2d 745,437 N.E.2d 271 |
| Parties | , 437 N.E.2d 271 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Michael SATLOFF, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 82 A.D.2d 896, 441 N.Y.S.2d 96, should be affirmed.
Defendant's contention that the jury's verdicts on two counts of the indictment are inconsistent is not preserved for our review. Following discharge of the jury, defense counsel complained, for the first time, of the asserted inconsistency. At this point, it was no longer possible to remedy the defect, if any, by resubmission to the jury for reconsideration of its verdicts (People v. Stahl, 53 N.Y.2d 1048, 1050, 442 N.Y.S.2d 488, 425 N.E.2d 876). Such a protest must be registered prior to the discharge of the jury properly to preserve the issue for review in this court.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Price v. State
...the verdict. This silence, operating as an acceptance of the verdict, waived any further review...."); People v. Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745, 452 N.Y.S.2d 12, 13, 437 N.E.2d 271, 272 (1982) (mem.) ("Following discharge of the jury, defense counsel complained, for the first time, of the asserted ......
-
Givens v. State
...This silence, operating as an acceptance of the verdict[s], waived any further review. ...”); People v. Satloff , 56 N.Y.2d 745, 452 N.Y.S.2d 12,[ ] 437 N.E.2d 271, 272 (1982) (mem.) (“Following discharge of the jury, [the defendant's] counsel complained, for the first time, of the asserted......
-
People v. Gallagher
...v. Goodfriend, 64 N.Y.2d 695, 485 N.Y.S.2d 519, 474 N.E.2d 1187; People v. Satloff, 82 A.D.2d 896, 441 N.Y.S.2d 96, affd. 56 N.Y.2d 745, 452 N.Y.S.2d 12, 437 N.E.2d 271; People v. Tucker, supra; People v. Carbonell, 40 N.Y.2d 948, 390 N.Y.S.2d 409, 358 N.E.2d 1034; People v. Kenny, 100 A.D.......
-
People v. Thorpe
...murder in the second degree and gang assault in the second degree was not preserved for our review (see People v. Satloff, 56 N.Y.2d 745, 746, 452 N.Y.S.2d 12, 437 N.E.2d 271 [1982] ; People v. Vargas, 72 A.D.3d 1114, 1119 n. 5, 898 N.Y.S.2d 323 [2010], lv. denied 15 N.Y.3d 758, 906 N.Y.S.2......