People v. Scantleberry
| Decision Date | 02 July 1984 |
| Citation | 477 N.Y.S.2d 596,103 A.D.2d 758 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Guillermo SCANTLEBERRY, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Jay M. Schornstein, New York City, for appellant. Elizabeth Holtzman, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Barbara D. Underwood, Michael Gore and Elyse Bohm, Asst. Dist. Attys., Brooklyn, of counsel), for respondent.
Two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Bonomo, J.), both rendered December 10, 1982, affirmed, without prejudice to defendant's right to bring a CPLR article 78 proceeding to review the determination computing his jail time credit (see People ex rel. Bridges v. Malcolm, 44 N.Y.2d 875, 407 N.Y.S.2d 628, 379 N.E.2d 156; People ex rel. Davis v. Arnette, 44 N.Y.2d 877, 407 N.Y.S.2d 629, 379 N.E.2d 157).
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
-
People of State v. Chambers, 11–00297.
...are improper is a petition under Article 78 of the N.Y. Civil Procedure Law and Rules. See People v. Scantleberry, 103 A.D.2d 758, 477 N.Y.S.2d 596 (2d Dep't 1984).2 SO ORDERED.--------Notes: 1. Such confusion may exist, in part, as a consequence of the Rochester City Court Clerk's April 27......
- Piazza v. Hastings Associates