People v. Sceravino, 2007-02994.

Decision Date02 December 2008
Docket Number2007-02994.
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. KEVIN SCERAVINO, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the record contains nothing to warrant the conclusion that he was deprived of his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel, which resulted in his consenting to a level two sex offender designation (see generally People v Carey, 47 AD3d 1079 [2008]; see also People v Costas, 46 AD3d 475 [2007]).

Before: MASTRO, J.P., RIVERA, FISHER and ENG, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People of State v. Bowles
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 1 Noviembre 2011
    ...( see People v. Reitano, 68 A.D.3d 954, 889 N.Y.S.2d 857; People v. Kinlock, 66 A.D.3d 980, 981, 888 N.Y.S.2d 119; People v. Sceravino, 57 A.D.3d 503, 867 N.Y.S.2d 696; People v. Rios, 57 A.D.3d 501, 868 N.Y.S.2d 295; People v. Austin, 54 A.D.3d 916, 917, 863 N.Y.S.2d 613; People v. Pipkin,......
  • People v. Rios
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Diciembre 2008
  • Phelan v. Huntington Tri-Village Little League, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Diciembre 2008
  • Rose v. City of New Rochelle, 2007-08136.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Diciembre 2008

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT