People v. Schatz, s. 34166

Citation45 A.D.2d 853,358 N.Y.S.2d 506
Decision Date08 June 1974
Docket NumberNos. 34166,s. 34166
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Harold SCHATZ, Appellant. Indictment, etc.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and MARTUSCELLO, LATHAM, SHAPIRO and COHALAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County, imposed March 20, 1973.

Sentence reversed, on the law, and case remanded to the County Court for resentence in accordance with the views herein set forth.

The sentence in this case is illegal and unauthorized. Under the Penal Law as it now reads, a sentence to a State penal institution cannot run concurrently with a previously imposed sentence to a Federal penitentiary (see Penal Law §§ 70.25, 70.30, subd. 1).

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Peterson v. New York State Dept. of Correctional Services
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 12, 1984
    ...enacted to overcome the holdings of cases like People v. Etcheverry, 37 N.Y.2d 853, 378 N.Y.S.2d 40, 340 N.E.2d 473 and People v. Schatz, 45 A.D.2d 853, 358 N.Y.S.2d 506, which precluded running a State sentence concurrently with a Federal sentence (see People v. Troia, 96 A.D.2d 954, 466 N......
  • People v. Vitale
    • United States
    • New York County Court
    • October 10, 1974
    ... ... Bernard Tomson, and Harold Schatz at the time of that defendant's Change of Plea. During the course of plea taking, Judge Tomson spelled out his reliance upon a Department of ... ...
  • People v. Schiraldi
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • December 20, 1974
    ...previously imposed sentence to a federal facility. In this contention, the Department of Correction is correct (People v. Schatz, 45 A.D.2d 853, 358 N.Y.S.2d 506 (2d Dept., 1974)). A federal court is similarly precluded from imposing a sentence which runs concurrently with a state sentence,......
  • People ex rel. Giannone v. Crowley
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • April 30, 1975
    ...attempt to have a New York sentence run concurrently with a federal or out of state sentence was forbidden in People v. Schatz, 45 A.D.2d 853, 358 N.Y.S.2d 506; People v. Schiraldi, 80 Misc.2d 103, 362 N.Y.S.2d 378. Penal Law § 70.25 and § 70.30 subd. 1 appear to forbid this. Interesting co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT