People v. Sciacca

Decision Date22 September 1980
Citation78 A.D.2d 545,432 N.Y.S.2d 90
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Thomas SCIACCA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Dominic A. Villoni, Corona, for appellant.

John J. Santucci, Dist. Atty., Kew Gardens (Theodore Herold of counsel), for respondent.

Before MOLLEN, P. J., and HOPKINS, MANGANO and COHALAN, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered October 20, 1976, convicting him of criminal possession of stolen property in the second degree, upon a plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial of defendant's motion to suppress certain physical evidence.

Judgment reversed, on the law, motion to suppress granted and case remanded to Criminal Term for further proceedings consistent herewith.

The motion to suppress certain physical evidence should have been granted. At 11:00 P.M. on January 13, 1976, Detective Smith, who was investigating a warehouse burglary, received, from his superior a "tip" which had been received from an unknown informant. The informant said a truck with the same markings as the one used in the burglary had been seen at a garage at a certain address.

At about 1:00 A.M. the next morning, Detective Smith arrived at this address and walked up the driveway towards the four garages located on the premises. There was no truck visible. Smith looked into each of the garages and in one of them saw boxes similar to those taken from the warehouse. In order to observe the boxes he had to jump up in the air and shine his flashlight into the garage. He did not have a search warrant.

Later that morning Detective Smith returned with his partner to the premises. From a police car they observed a van go into the driveway and pull about one third of the way into the garage which contained the boxes. The two officers crossed the street and went up to the garage. There two men were observed loading the boxes from the garage into the van. The men were placed under arrest at about 10:20 A.M. Neither Detective Smith nor any other officer had made any effort to obtain a search warrant.

The initial warrantless entry by Detective Smith was an unreasonable search in violation of the Fourth Amendment (see People v. Gleeson, 36 N.Y.2d 462, 369 N.Y.S.2d 113, 330 N.E.2d 72; People v. Gravano, 67 A.D.2d 988, 413 N.Y.S.2d 429). Smith had only a second-hand anonymous tip concerning the garage which...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • People v. Allah
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 19 d4 Novembro d4 1981
    ...488 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1974) (illegal search of luggage in airport cannot provide justification for arrest); People v. Sciacca, 78 A.D.2d 545, 432 N.Y.S.2d 90 (2d Dept. 1980) (unreasonable warrantless search cannot justify arrest). Whatever is observed during an illegal stop cannot then pro......
  • People v. Alberti
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 22 d2 Maio d2 1984
    ...building, no doors were open, and there was no indication of invitation either personally or by a commercial sign (See, People v. Sciacca, 78 A.D.2d 545, 432 N.Y.S.2d 90 Raettig v. State, 406 So.2d 1273 In this court's view, People v. Spinelli, 42 A.D.2d 64, 345 N.Y.S.2d 87 (1973) and Peopl......
  • People v. Dennis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 7 d1 Novembro d1 1988
    ...a result of the January 8th stop of the defendant was untainted and could help provide probable cause to arrest (see, People v. Sciacca, 78 A.D.2d 545, 432 N.Y.S.2d 90). The record of the suppression hearing indicates that on January 14, 1985, arresting officer had sufficient information wh......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT