People v. Scott
| Decision Date | 04 June 1990 |
| Citation | 556 N.Y.S.2d 171,162 A.D.2d 479 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Mark SCOTT, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Matthew Muraskin, Hempstead (Nancy Schindler, of counsel), for appellant.
Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (Bruce E. Whitney and Lisa J. Becker, of counsel), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and KUNZEMAN, HARWOOD and MILLER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Mackston, J.), rendered June 12, 1987, convicting him of assault in the second degree, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant argues that the prosecution failed to prove that the arresting officer suffered a physical injury as defined in Penal Law § 10.00(9), requiring reversal of his judgment of conviction for assault in the second degree (Penal Law § 120.05[3]. We disagree. At the trial, the police officer testified that as a result of the defendant kicking him in the head, he saw spots and felt very intense pain. The injury suffered in the attack prompted him to seek medical treatment at a local hospital where X rays were taken and where he had several eye examinations. His head was tender to the touch and he took medication for several days to relieve the pain. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt. The jury could reasonably infer from the officer's testimony that the pain he suffered was substantial (see, People v. Lundquist, 151 A.D.2d 505, 542 N.Y.S.2d 295).
The defendant's contention that the trial court improperly conducted the trial is belied by the record (see, People v. De Jesus, 42 N.Y.2d 519, 399 N.Y.S.2d 196, 369 N.E.2d 752; People v. Vargas, 150 A.D.2d 513, 541 N.Y.S.2d 107). The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting an adjournment (see, People v. Tineo, 64 N.Y.2d 531, 490 N.Y.S.2d 159, 479 N.E.2d 795; People v. Vargas, 150 A.D.2d 513, 541 N.Y.S.2d 107, supra ). In addition, contrary to the defendant's contention, in questioning one of the People's witnesses, the court properly intervened to clarify issues (see, People v. Nevarez, 141 A.D.2d 861, 530 N.Y.S.2d 203). In any event, this questioning did not unfairly prejudice the defendant since upon his motion it was stricken from the record. Nor did the court act improperly in allowing the prosecution to reopen its direct case. The determination to reopen a case during trial for further testimony...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jason J., Matter of
...People v. Greene, 70 N.Y.2d 860, 523 N.Y.S.2d 458, 517 N.E.2d 1344; People v. Miller, 146 A.D.2d 809, 537 N.Y.S.2d 287; People v. Scott, 162 A.D.2d 479, 556 N.Y.S.2d 171; People v. Soto, 184 A.D.2d 673, 584 N.Y.S.2d 877. The hearing court properly denied the appellant's request for a missin......
-
People v. Valentin
...e.g., People v. Soto, 184 A.D.2d 673, 674, 584 N.Y.S.2d 877; People v. Morgan, 191 A.D.2d 649, 650, 595 N.Y.S.2d 237; People v. Scott, 162 A.D.2d 479, 556 N.Y.S.2d 171; People v. Lundquist, 151 A.D.2d 505, 506, 542 N.Y.S.2d 295; People v. Esquilin, 141 A.D.2d 838, 839, 530 N.Y.S.2d 177). We......
-
People v. Mallard
...sufficient to establish that the officers suffered "physical injury" within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00(9) (see, People v. Scott, 162 A.D.2d 479, 556 N.Y.S.2d 171, lv. denied 76 N.Y.2d 865, 560 N.Y.S.2d 1004, 561 N.E.2d 904; People v. Brooks, 155 A.D.2d 680, 681-682, 548 N.Y.S.2d 58, l......
-
People v. Scott
...560 N.Y.S.2d 1004 76 N.Y.2d 865, 561 N.E.2d 904 People v. Scott (Mark) COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK AUG 20, 1990 Alexander, J. 162 A.D.2d 479, 556 N.Y.S.2d 171 App.Div. 2, Nassau Denied ...