People v. Sealey

Decision Date21 October 2020
Docket Number2018–08784,Ind.No. 17–00051
Citation131 N.Y.S.3d 179 (Mem),187 A.D.3d 1067
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Jaime SEALEY, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Yasmin Daley Duncan, Brooklyn, NY, for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Anna K. Diehn of counsel), for respondent.

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P., JOSEPH J. MALTESE, BETSY BARROS, VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Peter M. Forman, J.), rendered November 14, 2017, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree and bribing a witness, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid because the County Court's oral colloquy mischaracterized the appellate rights waived as encompassing a bar to filing an appellate brief and the loss of attendant rights to counsel and poor person relief (see People v. Thomas, 34 N.Y.3d 545, 560–564, 122 N.Y.S.3d 226, 144 N.E.3d 970 ; People v. Walder, 186 A.D.3d 1272, 127 N.Y.S.3d 894 [2d Dept.] ; People v. Howard, 183 A.D.3d 640, 121 N.Y.S.3d 622 ). These defects were not cured by the terms of the written appeal waiver form which repeated many of the mischaracterizations contained in the court's oral colloquy (see People v. Howard, 183 A.D.3d 640, 121 N.Y.S.3d 622 ). Thus, the purported waiver does not preclude appellate review of the defendant's excessive sentence claim (see id. ; People v. Fuller, 163 A.D.3d 715, 76 N.Y.S.3d 852 ).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

RIVERA, J.P., MALTESE, BARROS, BRATHWAITE NELSON and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • People v. Bisono
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • December 15, 2020
  • People v. Wright
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 24, 2021
  • People v. Wright
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 24, 2021
    ... ... mischaracterized the appellate rights waived as encompassing ... a bar to filing an appellate brief and the loss of attendant ... rights to counsel and poor person relief (see ... People v Kaye, 190 A.D.3d 767, 767-768; People v ... Sealey, 187 A.D.3d 1067, 1067; People v Walder, ... 186 A.D.3d 1272, 1272; see also People v Howard, 183 ... A.D.3d 640, 640; People v McDowell, 181 A.D.3d 716, ... 716; People v Baptiste, 181 A.D.3d 696, 696) ... Although the People cite to a written waiver that was ... ...
  • People v. Wright
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 24, 2021
    ...brief and the loss of attendant rights to counsel and poor person relief (see People v Kaye, 190 A.D.3d 767, 767-768; People v Sealey, 187 A.D.3d 1067, 1067; People v Walder, 186 A.D.3d 1272, 1272; see also People v Howard, 183 A.D.3d 640, 640; People v McDowell, 181 A.D.3d 716, 716; People......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT