People v. Shearin
| Decision Date | 24 January 1977 |
| Citation | 390 N.Y.S.2d 653,55 A.D.2d 939 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Appellant, v. Thomas R. SHEARIN, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Henry F. O'Brien, Dist. Atty., Riverhead (Charles M. Newell, Chief of Appeals Bureau and William A. Wismann, Asst. Dist. Atty., Riverhead, of counsel), for appellant.
Litman, Friedman & Kaufman, New York City (Herman Kaufman and Lewis R. Friedman, New York City, of counsel), for respondent.
Before HOPKINS, Acting P.J., and MARTUSCELLO, LATHAM, TITONE and HAWKINS, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the People from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County, dated December 24, 1975, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment, which charged him with assault in the second degree.
Order reversed, on the law, and indictment reinstated.
It was an improvident exercise of discretion to dismiss the indictment 'in the interest of justice' (see CPL 210.40, subd. 2). The authorities cited by the County Court in support of its determination, People v. Clayton, 41 A.D.2d 204, 342 N.Y.S.2d 106 and People v. Davis, 55 Misc.2d 656, 286 N.Y.S.2d 396, are inapplicable. In Clayton we set forth the criteria for such a dismissal; none is here present. Nor do we have a plea of guilty to a misdemeanor and a statement by the Probation Department, in a presentence report, that defendant is making an 'excellent adjustment', or any of the other extenuating and compelling factors which were found in Davis (supra). Unlike Davis, at bar a 'member of the public has suffered' because of the defendant's conduct (see People v. Davis, 55 Misc.2d 656, 658, 286 N.Y.S.2d 396, 399, Supra).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Williams
...271; People v. Scroggins, 56 A.D.2d 856, 392 N.Y.S.2d 235; People v. Isaacson, 56 A.D.2d 220, 392 N.Y.S.2d 157; People v. Shearin, 55 A.D.2d 939, 390 N.Y.S.2d 653; People v. Rao, 53 A.D.2d 904, 386 N.Y.S.2d 441; People v. Singleton, 50 A.D.2d 938, 377 N.Y.S.2d 198; People v. Belkota, 50 A.D......
-
People v. Zagarino
...A.D.2d 204, 207-208, 342 N.Y.S.2d 106, supra ; cf. People v. Belge, 41 N.Y.2d 60, 62, 390 N.Y.S.2d 867, 359 N.E.2d 377; People v. Shearin, 55 A.D.2d 939, 390 N.Y.S.2d 653). It is not adapted to the ebb and flow of a trial, where determinations must be made speedily. If circumstances arise d......
- People v. Sanchez
- Arredondo v. State of New York