People v. Singleton

Decision Date07 January 2021
Docket NumberCase No. 2015-2424,Ind. No. 734/08,12811
Citation190 A.D.3d 466,139 N.Y.S.3d 201
Parties The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Warren SINGLETON, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

190 A.D.3d 466
139 N.Y.S.3d 201

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Warren SINGLETON, Defendant–Appellant.

12811
Ind.
No. 734/08
Case No. 2015-2424

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

ENTERED: January 7, 2021


139 N.Y.S.3d 202

Janet E. Sabel, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Jose David Rodriguez Gonzalez of counsel), for appellant.

Darcel D. Clark, District Attorney, Bronx (Emily A. Aldridge of counsel), for respondent.

Manzanet–Daniels, J.P., Kapnick, Moulton, González, Scarpulla, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Raymond L. Bruce, J.), entered on or about September 17, 2014, which adjudicated defendant a level two sexually violent offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law art 6–C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion when it declined to grant a downward departure (see People v. Gillotti, 23 N.Y.3d 841, 994 N.Y.S.2d 1, 18 N.E.3d 701 [2014] ). Defendant does not dispute that his prior second-degree robbery subjected him to a 30–point assessment for having committed a violent felony as defined by statute. Instead, he argues that a downward departure is warranted because the conviction was based on only his being "aided by another" ( Penal Law § 160.10[1] ), and that the lack of actual violence involved is a mitigating factor not adequately accounted for in the risk assessment instrument. However, that type of robbery is inherently violent, because it necessarily involves "forcible stealing" ( Penal Law § 160.00 ), and the participation of more than one robber poses "a threat of additional violence" ( People v. Dennis, 146 A.D.2d 708, 708, 537 N.Y.S.2d 204 [2d Dept. 1989], affd 75 N.Y.2d 821, 552 N.Y.S.2d 559, 551 N.E.2d 1237 [1990] ; see also People v. Sanchez, 13 N.Y.3d 554, 565, 893 N.Y.S.2d 803, 921 N.E.2d 570 [2009] ). In any event, this alleged mitigating factor, taken together with the other mitigating factors cited by defendant, are outweighed by several aggravating factors.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT