People v. Soddano
| Decision Date | 29 June 1995 |
| Parties | , 655 N.E.2d 161 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David L. SODDANO, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Term should be affirmed.
A State Trooper observed defendant operating his vehicle at the speed of 76 miles per hour on State Route 17 and issued a speeding ticket. Defendant appeared for trial in the Blooming Grove Town Court (Orange County) and met with the Trooper to discuss a possible plea agreement. Defendant sought to plead guilty to a defective speedometer charge, but the Trooper offered only a lesser degree of speeding. Defendant rejected the Trooper's offer and the case proceeded to trial before the Town Justice and was prosecuted by the Trooper over defendant's objection. Defendant argued that only the District Attorney's office could prosecute the case. Defendant was convicted and sentenced to a fine. The Appellate Term affirmed the judgment of conviction, ruling that it was permissible for the complainant State Trooper to prosecute the traffic infraction in lieu of an Assistant District Attorney.
County Law § 700(1) provides that "[i]t shall be the duty of every district attorney to conduct all prosecutions for crimes and offenses cognizable by the courts of the county for which he or she shall have been elected or appointed." It is well settled, however, that this statute does not require the District Attorney's personal presence at every criminal hearing in a county, and the prosecution of petty crimes or offenses may be delegated to subordinates and other public or administrative officers and even to private attorneys (see, People v. DeLeyden, 10 N.Y.2d 293, 294, 220 N.Y.S.2d 961, 177 N.E.2d 924 []; People v. Czajka, 11 N.Y.2d 253, 254, 228 N.Y.S.2d 809, 183 N.E.2d 216 []. District Attorneys, of course, retain the ultimate, nondelegable responsibility for prosecuting all crimes and offenses, but they may allow appearances by public officers or private attorneys so long as they are kept aware of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Christensen
...be delegated to subordinates and other public or administrative officers and even to private attorneys" ( People v. Soddano, 86 N.Y.2d 727, 728, 631 N.Y.S.2d 120, 655 N.E.2d 161; see Matter of Sedore v. Epstein, 56 A.D.3d at 65, 864 N.Y.S.2d 543). Accordingly, the delegation of the prosecut......
-
Jeffryes v. Vance
...of petty crimes and offenses" to other public officers, as long as he remains aware of all delegated prosecutions. People v. Soddano, 86 N.Y.2d 727, 728, 631 N.Y.S.2d 120, 655 N.E.2d 161 (1995). The MOU requires the Police Department to provide to the District Attorney a monthly report of a......
-
People v. Viviani
...lacks statutory support and would instead need to be imported from language found in this Court's decisions in People v. Soddano, 86 N.Y.2d 727, 631 N.Y.S.2d 120, 655 N.E.2d 161 (1995) and People v. Van Sickle, 13 N.Y.2d 61, 242 N.Y.S.2d 34, 192 N.E.2d 9 (1963). However, in both Soddano and......
-
Haggerty v. Himelein
... ... has been obtained from Goodell, that all of their discussions about the case have been with Goodell, and that all correspondence from the People has been drafted on the Attorney-General's letterhead ... In late January and early February 1996, several petitioners moved to ... Soddano, 86 N.Y.2d 727, 728, 631 N.Y.S.2d 120, 655 N.E.2d 161; People v. Van Sickle, 13 N.Y.2d 61, 62-63, 242 N.Y.S.2d 34, 192 N.E.2d 9; People v. Czajka, ... ...
-
The Courts’ Consensus: Money Does Matter for Educational Opportunity
...No. 94340058/CE189672 (Baltimore City Cir. Ct. 2000).Brigham v. State, 692 A.2d 384 (Vt. 1997).Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State, 655 N.E.2d 161 (N.Y. 1995) ( “CFE I”).Campaign for Fiscal Equity, Inc. v. State, 801 N.E.2d 326 (N.Y. 2003) (“CFE II”).Campbell County Sch. Dist. v. Stat......