People v. Spears

Citation715 N.Y.S.2d 640,276 A.D.2d 725
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division
Decision Date23 October 2000
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>CORY SPEARS, Appellant.

Bracken, J.P., Thompson, S. Miller and Florio, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not err in accepting a partial verdict (see, People v Mendez, 221 AD2d 162; People v Andino, 210 AD2d 28). "Neither CPL 310.70 nor any other provision of law, precludes a trial court's inquiry into whether the jury, after a substantial period of deliberation, has agreed upon a verdict" as to any of the defendants or any of the counts submitted, and in then accepting a partial verdict (People v Mendez, supra, at 163; see, People v Bordas, 226 AD2d 261).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Spears v. Greiner
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • August 2, 2006
    ...affirmed Spears's conviction, rejecting the claim that the trial court erred in accepting a partial verdict. People v. Spears, 276 A.D.2d 725, 715 N.Y.S.2d 640 (2000). The Appellate Division did not refer to the regarding the supplemental charge. The petitioner's application for permission ......
  • People v. Morales
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 23, 2000

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT