People v. Spiegelman
| Decision Date | 06 May 1963 |
| Citation | 240 N.Y.S.2d 40,19 A.D.2d 538 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. David SPIEGELMAN, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Robert D. Foglia, New York City, for appellant.
Edward S. Silver, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn, for respondent People. Harold M. Brown, New York City, of counsel, for respondent.
Before BELDOCK, P. J., and KLEINFELD, HILL, RABIN and HOPKINS, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the former Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, County of Kings, rendered June 21, 1961, convicting him of a violation of section 600 of the Vehicle and Traffic Law (); sentencing him to pay a fine of $100 or, in the alternative, to serve 30 days in the City Prison; and revoking his license to operate a motor vehicle. The fine was paid.
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts; information dismissed; fine remitted; and the revocation of defendant's license vacated.
Upon the facts in this record, it does not appear that the defendant knew that an injury had been caused or that the had left the place of the accident without stopping.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Green Bus Lines, Inc. v. Consolidated Mut. Ins. Co.
...Cent. Ins. Co., 33 Misc.2d 816, 819-820, 227 N.Y.S.2d 873, mot. to vacate decision den. 34 Misc.2d 687, 689-692, 230 N.Y.S.2d 126, affd. 19 A.D.2d 538). Both third-party complaints meet this In addition to the broad coverage provision, insurance policies often contain certain exceptions whi......
-
Mobil Oil Corp. v. Reliance Ins. Co.
...Green v. Travelers Ins. Co., 286 N.Y. 358, 36 N.E.2d 620; Sachs v. American Central Ins. Co., 34 Misc.2d 687, 230 N.Y.S.2d 126, aff'd 19 A.D.2d 538; see American Fid. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pardo, 32 A.D.2d 536, 299 N.Y.S.2d 521). 'An exclusion, in insurance parlance, serves the purpose of taking......
-
Campbell v. Westmoreland Farm, Inc.
...motorist leaves the scene of an accident without knowing that there has been any damage or injury sustained. People v. Spiegelman, 1963, 19 A.D.2d 538, 240 N.Y.S.2d 40; People v. Edwards, 1962, 35 Misc.2d 147, 228 N.Y.S.2d 968, rev'd on other grounds, 1963, 12 N.Y.2d 969, 238 N.Y.S. 2d 962,......
-
American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. Pardo
...that the occurrence came within the exclusionary clause (Sachs v. American Cent. Ins. Co., 34 Misc.2d 687, 230 N.Y.S.2d 126, affd. 19 A.D.2d 538) and that its own construction of the exclusionary clause was the only one that could fairly be placed on it (Sincoff, Supra, 11 N.Y.2d p. 390, 23......