People v. Stewart

Decision Date27 July 2017
Citation417 P.3d 882
Docket Number15CA0717
Parties The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Coleman Backstrom STEWART, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
7 cases
  • People v. Richardson
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • August 23, 2018
    ...a permissible variation depends upon whether it tends to confuse or mislead the jury."); see also People v. Stewart , 2017 COA 99, ¶ 67, 417 P.3d 882 (stating that discrepancies between experimental evidence created for trial and actual conditions at the time of the crime went to the eviden......
  • People v. Gwinn
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • September 6, 2018
    ...asked in response to an inconsistent statement by Officer Perez—that Gwinn’s speech was normal. Cf. People v. Stewart , 2017 COA 99, ¶ 11, 417 P.3d 882 (concluding the trial court erred in allowing the prosecutor to lead a witness where there was no lack of recollection, no writing introduc......
  • People v. Fortson
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • April 5, 2018
    ...appeal. First, "a defendant, though entitled to a fair trial, is not entitled to a perfect trial." People v. Stewart , 2017 COA 99, ¶ 79, 417 P.3d 882. Second, "because courts do not reverse convictions to punish prosecutors, see Crider v. People , 186 P.3d 39, 44 (Colo. 2008), defendant mu......
  • People v. Snelling
    • United States
    • Colorado Court of Appeals
    • October 6, 2022
    ..."we cannot say ... is likely to arise again on remand"). See generally People v. Stewart , 2017 COA 99, ¶ 64, 417 P.3d 882 (J. Jones, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) ("[O]ur common practice is to address contentions that pertain to issues likely to arise on remand.").¶ 64 The......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Witness
    • United States
    • James Publishing Practical Law Books Trial Objections
    • May 5, 2022
    ...identifying the defendant, as witness had previously identified the defendant during a preliminary hearing. COLORADO People v. Stewart , 417 P.3d 882, 894 (Colo. 2018). Prosecutor’s question to witness who had seen some of police chase of defendant, asking, “If you told the officer at the t......