People v. Stewart
| Decision Date | 16 October 1952 |
| Docket Number | Cr. 856 |
| Citation | 113 Cal.App.2d 687,248 P.2d 768 |
| Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | PEOPLE v. STEWART. |
John M. Nairn, Bakersfield, for appellant.
Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Clemens, Deputy Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Defendant was convicted by a jury of first-degree burglary on December 24, 1951. The action was consolidated for trial with another action in which defendant was accused and found guilty of violating sec. 4532 of the Penal Code in escaping from a road camp. No appeal is being prosecuted from the judgment in the latter case.
It is claimed that the evidence is insufficient (1) as to the establishment of defendant's intent to commit theft at the time of entry into the building; (2) to show that the burglary was committed in the nighttime; and (3) to show burglary of the first degree. He cites such cases as People v. Golembiewski, 25 Cal.App.2d 115, 76 P.2d 717; People v. Gibson, 107 Cal.App. 76, 289 P. 937; and sec. 1097, Penal Code.
On the night of December 23, about 10:30, defendant, an escapee from the road camp, met a soldier at a bar in Lamont. Defendant was driving a blue Kaiser car but had no money. They discussed the possibility of picking up some girls. After visiting several of the bars, they proceeded to Maricopa Farms, because defendant said he knew a girl, Myrtle Dawn, who lived there. They first visited with some neighbors of the Dawns. Defendant told the soldier he was going down to his 'buddy's' or 'brother's' house, i. e., the 'Gates' cabin, to get some clothes, etc. They arrived there about 1 a. m., and found the front door padlocked and the house was in complete darkness. Defendant tore off the padlock and entered. He immediately went to the gas range and fried some potatoes and other food, ate, and went to bed. The next morning they went to a neighboring home. Defendant drove away in his car and disappeared for a while. He reappeared in the afternoon and later disappeared sometime between 5 and 7 p. m. During the interval the soldier had been warned to be careful and not to associate with defendant. The soldier did not see the defendant again until about 9:30 p. m., at which time he drove up in his car and had three or four pints of gin and some money on his person. Defendant tried to persuade the soldier to go along with him but the soldier refused. Defendant depared alone about 11 p. m.
The evidence further shows that Mrs. Gates had known defendant in the past; that he had stayed at their home for about one week in October; that on December 23, she and her family left their family home locked and were visiting some friends in Bakersfield; that someone phoned her on December 26 and told her that her home had been broken into. She testified she never gave defendant permission to enter her home at any time. On her return she found that a radio, musical powder box, two towel sets and some robes had been taken. Some of the articles were from a locked cedar chest that had been broken into.
On December 24, about noon, defendant went to his parked car, brought the powder box into the home of Myrtle Dawn, and gave it to her for a Christmas present. On December 26, when the neighbors discovered the house had been broken into and was in shambles, a new lock was placed on the door and the owner was notified. On December 24, between 8 and 9 p. m. defendant went to a bar several miles from there and asked for a bottle of gin on credit, which was refused. He returned to his car and brought in a bundle of towels taken from the Gates home and exchanged it for a pint of gin. The owner of the bar reported defendant's car number to the sheriff.
At the trial defendant denied being an escapee, denied being at the Maricopa Farms on any of the occasions mentioned, and denied ever seeing the soldier or the five other witnesses who testified as to his presence near the scene of the burglary on the occasions mentioned. He claimed he was in Oklahoma until December 24, and that on that evening he was in Earlimart, playing for a dance; that the blue Kaiser car he was driving when apprehended in Fresno belonged to a 'kid' whom the 'law picked up at Fresno'; and that he asked the defendant to keep his car until 'he got out'. He admitted a prior conviction of felony for theft of an automobile in New Mexico, and that he served five years sentence therefor; and that he was subsequently committed to San Quentin from Kern County, California, for escaping from a county hospital while in custody.
The jury returned a verdict of guilty on both counts within one-half hour after retirement. Complaint is made that the jury did not have sufficient time to fully consider the facts and apply...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. McFarland
...commits no further offense on the premises (People v. Clifton (1957) 148 Cal.App.2d 276, 279(3), 306 P.2d 545; People v. Stewart (1952) 113 Cal.App.2d 687, 691(6), 248 P.2d 768; People v. Sturman (1942) 56 Cal.App.2d 173, 180-181(7) 132 P.2d 504), and hence that to support a conviction of b......
-
People v. Powell, Cr. 7184
... ... People v. Henderson, 13, Cal.App.2d 505, 509, 292 P.2d 267; People v. Primo, 121 Cal.App.2d 466, 468, 263 P.2d 443; People ... v. Stewart, 113 Cal.App.2d 687, 690, 248 P.2d 768 ... The identification of the appellant by the officer in this case was positive. It was for the trial judge to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses and to resolve any conflicts in the testimony. People v. Barnett, 159 Cal.App.2d 22, ... ...
-
People v. Williams, A112534 (Cal. App. 10/3/2007), A112534
...minute the defendant entered the . . . residence with intent to commit" either murder or assault with a deadly weapon. (People v. Stewart (1952) 113 Cal.App.2d 687, 691.) Contrary to defendant's contentions, arming himself with a loaded pellet gun, a loaded revolver, and a pipe, and his sta......
-
People v. Vargas
...(Id. at p. 422.) Property also was stolen from the premises entered in Jordan, supra, 204 Cal.App.2d at page 786, and People v. Stewart (1952) 113 Cal.App.2d 687, 691. In Fitch, supra, 73 Cal.App.2d at page 827, a can of gum had been moved from beneath a counter in the restaurant where the ......