People v. Stone
| Decision Date | 20 May 1966 |
| Citation | 270 N.Y.S.2d 559,25 A.D.2d 950 |
| Parties | PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Clayton A. STONE, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Hayden H. Dadd, Attica, for appellant.
Edward F. Mergler, Bolivar, for respondent.
Before BASTOW, J.P., and GOLDMAN, HENRY, DEL VECCHIO and MARSH, JJ.
Defendant was indicted for burglary, third degree, and petit larceny for allegedly breaking into a Country Club. Upon arraignment he plead not guilty and an attorney was assigned to him. Thereafter he withdrew his not guilty plea, plead guilty and was sentenced to five to ten years. In his petition in this coram nobis proceeding which was denied without a hearing, defendant states that his guilty plea was made upon advice of his counsel who had concealed from him the fact that his brother was the president of the Country Club. It was conceded by the District Attorney upon argument of this appeal that the judge who made the assignment of counsel knew of this family relationship. This fact raises a serious question as to a possible conflict of interest of defendant's attorney and requires a hearing to determine whether his relationship with one, who would probably be the complaining witness against defendant if the case had proceeded to trial, vitiated the effective aid of assigned counsel. Defendant's right to counsel is guaranteed by the Federal Constitution (Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799) and a full inquiry should be had at a hearing to determine whether, under all the circumstances, defendant was denied this constitutional right.
Order unanimously reversed and matter remitted to Allegany County Court for a hearing in accordance with the Memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Reed
...assented to it. A potential conflict of interest, such as this, may vitiate the effective assistance of counsel. People v. Stone, 25 A.D.2d 950, 270 N.Y.S.2d 559. Although the right to the effective assistance of counsel is " fundamental"; Argersinger v. Hamlin, 407 U.S. 25, 92 S.Ct. 2006, ......