People v. Suba
Decision Date | 04 May 1987 |
Citation | 130 A.D.2d 526,515 N.Y.S.2d 106 |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Curtis SUBA, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Marilyn Feuer, Woodmere, for appellant.
Denis Dillon, Dist. Atty., Mineola (Anthony J. Girese and Douglas Noll, of counsel), for respondent.
Before THOMPSON, J.P., and LAWRENCE, RUBIN, KOOPER and SULLIVAN, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Thorp, J.), rendered October 16, 1981, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
In the absence of anything in the record to suggest that the defendant's plea was either improvident or baseless, the sentencing court did not abuse its discretion in denying the defendant's application to withdraw his plea, predicated upon a bare assertion of innocence and having been under personal pressure at the time the plea was entered (see, People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 365 N.Y.S.2d 161, 324 N.E.2d 544; People v. Dixon, 29 N.Y.2d 55, 323 N.Y.S.2d 825, 272 N.E.2d 329; People v. Garrett, 43 A.D.2d 503, 352 N.Y.S.2d 713, affd. 36 N.Y.2d 727, 367 N.Y.S.2d 975, 328 N.E.2d 487).
The remaining issues asserted on this appeal, which challenge the sufficiency of the defendant's plea allocution, were not preserved for appellate review because the defendant failed to raise them in his application to withdraw his plea prior to the imposition of sentence (see, People v. Pellegrino, 60 N.Y.2d 636, 467 N.Y.S.2d 355, 454 N.E.2d 938; People v. Bryant, 107 A.D.2d 817, 484 N.Y.S.2d 654). In any event, the defendant's contentions are without merit. During the plea allocution, the defendant testified:
In view of the defendant's acknowledgement that he had discussed defenses to the charges of felony murder and robbery with his attorney and his unprompted...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Smith
...inquiry established all the essential elements of murder in the second degree (see, Penal Law § 125.25[1]; see, e.g., People v. Suba, 130 A.D.2d 526, 515 N.Y.S.2d 106; People v. Santana, 110 A.D.2d 789, 488 N.Y.S.2d 408, lv. dismissed 67 N.Y.2d 656, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1053, 490 N.E.2d 570). Defen......
-
People v. Bourdonnay
...of innocence or that the defendant was ill-advised will be insufficient to warrant withdrawal of the plea (see, People v. Suba, 130 A.D.2d 526, 527, 515 N.Y.S.2d 106; People v. Florian, 145 A.D.2d 645, 536 N.Y.S.2d 705), especially where, as here, the court had the defendant's written reque......
-
People v. Loftus
...duty to inquire about a possible intoxication defense (see People v. Sierra, 256 A.D.2d 598, 599, 683 N.Y.S.2d 563 ; People v. Suba, 130 A.D.2d 526, 527, 515 N.Y.S.2d 106 ). Moreover, since the defendant did not move to withdraw his plea prior to sentencing, and there was nothing in his ple......
-
People v. Middleton
...robbery (Santana, supra, 110 A.D.2d at 789, 488 N.Y.S.2d 408; see also, People v. Orr, 144 A.D.2d 391, 533 N.Y.S.2d 907; People v. Suba, 130 A.D.2d 526, 515 N.Y.S.2d 106). In this regard, defendant's 1984 robbery conviction is readily distinguished from those cases where the defendant's lev......