People v. Sumpter

Decision Date20 August 2001
Citation729 N.Y.S.2d 506,286 A.D.2d 450
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,<BR>v.<BR>BRIAN SUMPTER, Appellant.

Ritter, J. P., McGinity, Luciano and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating so much of the defendant's sentence as imposed five years of post-release supervision; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the credible evidence. The People's witnesses established that at 1:30 A.M. on May 24, 1998, Police Officers Parpan and Serrano were on routine motor patrol in Roosevelt, New York, when they heard gunshots and saw the defendant and another man running away from the Steer Inn, the establishment in front of which the shooting had just occurred. Parpan and Serrano gave chase, and observed the defendant throw what appeared to be a gun over a fence into some bushes. Officer Parpan ultimately caught up with the defendant, arrested and searched him, and found a bag of marihuana in his pocket. A Lorcin .380 semiautomatic handgun was subsequently recovered from behind the fence where the officers had seen the defendant throw it.

It is well settled that issues of credibility, as well as the weight to be accorded the evidence presented, are primarily questions to be determined by the jury, which saw and heard the witnesses (see, People v Gaimari, 176 NY 84, 94; People v Fisher, 143 AD2d 1037). The jury's determination should be accorded great weight on appeal and should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the record (see, People v Darty, 177 AD2d 587, 588; People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88). Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The hearing court properly admitted into evidence the Lorcin.380 handgun found behind the fence in the bushes, as the defendant deliberately abandoned it (see, People v Bloomfield, 221 AD2d 651; see also, People v Boodle, 47 NY2d 398, 404, cert denied 444 US 969). Further, the discarding of the gun provided Officer Parpan with probable cause to arrest the defendant, search him, and seize the marihuana in his pocket (see, People v Valentine, 220 AD2d 708, 709).

The trial court erred in admitting into evidence five shell casings recovered from the ground at the scene of the shooting.

The police ballistics experts were unable to connect the shells to the defendant's Lorcin. The error, however, was harmless since nearly all of the witnesses testified, without objection by the defense, that several shots had been fired right outside the Steer Inn, and that there were shell casings on the sidewalk in front of the bar (see, People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230).

The defendant's current claim, that the explanations given by the prosecutor for challenging four minority jurors were "pretextual" is not preserved for appellate review. The defendant did not object during jury selection to any of the prosecutor's explanations regarding those jurors, nor did he articulate the arguments he...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Russell
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 13, 2015
    ...defendant" in accordance with the plea agreement (People v. Gibbons, 101 A.D.3d 1615, 1616, 956 N.Y.S.2d 720 ; see People v. Sumpter, 286 A.D.2d 450, 452, 729 N.Y.S.2d 506, lv. denied 97 N.Y.2d 658, 737 N.Y.S.2d 60, 762 N.E.2d 938 ; see generally CPL 400.10[1] ). We reject defendant's conte......
  • People v. Rogers
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 22, 2017
    ...A.D.3d 1318, 1319, 38 N.Y.S.3d 325 [4th Dept. 2016], lv denied 28 N.Y.3d 1150, 52 N.Y.S.3d 301, 74 N.E.3d 686 [2017] ; People v. Sumpter, 286 A.D.2d 450, 452, 729 N.Y.S.2d 506 [2d Dept. 2001], lv denied 97 N.Y.2d 658, 737 N.Y.S.2d 60, 762 N.E.2d 938 [2001] ). We further conclude, however, t......
  • People v. Sumpter
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • August 20, 2001
  • People v. Cummings, 2
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 11, 2002
    ...220 A.D.2d 708, 709). The defendant's remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit (see, People v Sumpter, 286 A.D.2d 450, lv denied 97 N.Y.2d PRUDENTI, P.J., SANTUCCI, LUCIANO and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT