People v. Tabizon, Cr. 6317

Decision Date16 December 1958
Docket NumberCr. 6317
Citation332 P.2d 697,166 Cal.App.2d 271
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Arthur TABIZON and Manuel Genaro Bermudez, Defendants, Manuel Genaro Bermudez, Defendant and Appellant.

Sam Bubrick, Los Angeles, for appellant.

Edmund G. Brown, Atty. Gen., William E. James, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

SHINN, Presiding Justice.

In a court trial, Arthur Tabizon and Manuel Genaro Bermudez were found guilty of possessing heroin and were sentenced to state prison. Bermudez appeals from the judgment and the denial of his motion for new trial. The sole contention is that the evidence was insufficient to prove the offense of possession.

The evidence consisted of that received at the preliminary hearing and additional evidence introduced at the trial. Pursuant to information received from a reliable confidential informant that one David Romero had just returned from Mexico with a large quantity of heroin and that two other Mexicans were selling the heroin at Room 28 of the Tick Tock Motel in Los Angeles, Deputy Sheriff Louis Peterson and four other deputies went to the motel on the evening of January 14, 1958. According to Peterson's informant, narcotic addicts would telephone the motel room from a phone booth on the street near the motel and one of the occupants would deliver the narcotics to the person making the call. Appellant did not request disclosure of the informer's name.

The deputies saw Bermudez's co-defendant Tabizon leave the motel room and approach another man who had just used the telephone inside the booth and was now standing nearby. They arrested Tabizon and escorted him back to the motel room; when they reached the door, he began to struggle and yell in Spanish.

Deputy Stahl looked through the door and saw Bermudez sitting in a chair, watching television. When ordered to open the door, appellant complied. The deputies entered, searched the room, and discovered a rubber contraceptive containing 43 capsules lying on top of a chest of drawers; underneath some khaki pants in the third drawer of the dresser they found a white balloon containing 23 more capsules. The capsules were proved to contain heroin.

When questioned by the deputies, Tabizon stated that he had been living in the room for about a week and that a man named Mike had delivered the narcotics earlier that day, but not to the motel room. Appellant told the officers that he had just arrived from Tijuana and had been in Los Angeles only a few hours.

Bermudez testified that he lived in Tijuana and had driven his lumber truck from Mexicali to Los Angeles on the day of the arrest. He went to Tabizon's motel room to sleep. He had known Tabizon for about six months and had stayed at the motel three times, the last time being four days before he was...

To continue reading

Request your trial
30 cases
  • People v. Perry
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 26, 1969
    ...185 Cal.App.2d 435, 437, 8 Cal.Rptr. 308; People v. Stanford (1959) 176 Cal.App.2d 388, 390, 1 Cal.Rptr. 425; People v. Tabizon (1958) 166 Cal.App.2d 271, 273, 332 P.2d 697; People v. Jackson (1958) 164 Cal.App.2d 772, 778, 331 P.2d 218; and People v. Rodriquez (1957) 151 Cal.App.2d 598, 60......
  • People v. Haynes
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • August 30, 1967
    ...It does not show that the narcotics in question were under his dominion and control.' (P. 391, 1 Cal.Rptr. p. 427) People v. Tabizon, 166 Cal.App.2d 271, 332 P.2d 697, and People v. Crayton, 156 Cal.App.2d 305, 319 P.2d 731, are referred to in Stanford, supra, as instances in which mere pre......
  • People v. Glass
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 21, 1975
    ...236--237, 93 Cal.Rptr. 197, 481 P.2d 205; People v. Stanford (1959) 176 Cal.App.2d 388, 391, 1 Cal.Rptr. 425; People v. Tabizon (1958) 166 Cal.App.2d 271, 273, 332 P.2d 697.) The presence of $270 in appellants' wallet would have some probative effect as circumstantial evidence if it was sho......
  • People v. Solis
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1961
    ... ... Tabizon, 166 Cal.App.2d 271, 273, 332 P.2d 697, 698; see also People v. Winston, 46 Cal.2d 151, 158, 293 P.2d 40. It was to the element of knowledge of the ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT