People v. Tarver
| Citation | 50 N.Y.S.3d 310 (Mem),149 A.D.3d 1350 |
| Decision Date | 20 April 2017 |
| Docket Number | 107045. |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Robert TARVER, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Kelly M. Monroe, Albany, for appellant.
P. David Soares, District Attorney, Albany (Vincent Stark of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Albany County (McDonough, J.), rendered July 29, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the second degree.
Defendant pleaded guilty to the single-count indictment charging him with burglary in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Defendant was sentenced to seven years in prison followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant appeals, solely contending that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive.
Contrary to the People's assertion, it was improper for County Court to require defendant to waive his right to appeal, as the record establishes that "there was no promise, plea agreement, reduced charge, or any other bargain or consideration given to ... defendant in exchange for his plea" (People v. Nicelli, 74 A.D.3d 1235, 1236–1237, 904 N.Y.S.2d 119 [2010] ; see People v. Crump, 107 A.D.3d 1046, 1047, 966 N.Y.S.2d 282 [2013], lv. denied 21 N.Y.3d 1014, 971 N.Y.S.2d 497, 994 N.E.2d 393 [2013] ). As such, defendant's challenge to the sentence is not precluded. Nevertheless, we are unpersuaded by defendant's contention that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. The record reflects that County Court considered appropriate factors in rendering the sentence and the sentence was within the permissible statutory range (see Penal Law § 70.02[1][b] ; [3][b] ). As we find no abuse of discretion by the court nor any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of the sentence imposed, it will not be disturbed (see People v. Crump, 107 A.D.3d at 1047, 966 N.Y.S.2d 282 ).
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Strong
...any extraordinary circumstances or an abuse of discretion that would warrant a reduction of his sentence (see People v. Tarver, 149 A.D.3d 1350, 1350, 50 N.Y.S.3d 310 [2017]; People v. Butler, 111 A.D.3d 1024, 1025, 975 N.Y.S.2d 218 [2013], lv. denied 23 N.Y.3d 961, 988 N.Y.S.2d 568, 11 N.E......
- People v. Iovino
-
People v. Lord, 108665
...circumstances or any abuse of discretion warranting a reduction of the sentence in the interest of justice (see People v. Tarver, 149 A.D.3d 1350, 1350, 50 N.Y.S.3d 310 [2017]; People v. Kime, 95 A.D.3d 1562, 1563, 944 N.Y.S.2d 683 [2012] ; People v. Thompkins, 58 A.D.3d 1068, 1069, 871 N.Y......
-
People v. Sanchez
...agreed not to pursue persistent felony offender sentencing and, thus, the waiver of appeal is enforceable (see People v. Tarver , 149 A.D.3d 1350, 1350, 50 N.Y.S.3d 310 [2017] ). However, the $5,000 fine was not part of the plea agreement and was instead imposed as an enhancement. Defendant......