People v. Terrell
| Decision Date | 09 November 2010 |
| Citation | 78 A.D.3d 865,910 N.Y.S.2d 368 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Tyrone O. TERRELL, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Martin Goldberg, Franklin Square, N.Y., for appellant, and appellant pro se.
Kathleen M. Rice, District Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Laurie K. Gibbons of counsel; Matthew C. Frankel on the brief), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County (Ayres, J.), rendered March 18, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel are based, in part, on matter dehors the record, which cannot be reviewed on direct appeal (see People v. Yagudaev,70 A.D.3d 984, 893 N.Y.S.2d 873; People v. Moss, 70 A.D.3d 862, 894 N.Y.S.2d 123). Insofar as we are able to review the defendant's claims, we find that defense counsel provided meaningful representation (see People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712-713, 674 N.Y.S.2d 629, 697 N.E.2d 584; People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 497 N.Y.S.2d 903, 488 N.E.2d 834; People v. Baldi, 54 N.Y.2d 137, 444 N.Y.S.2d 893, 429 N.E.2d 400). Contrary to the defendant's contention, his attorney pursued a reasonable defense, based on the theory that the defendant's intoxication negated any intent on his part to cause the victim's death. Indeed, in light of the evidence adduced by the People,this was the only viable defense. The defendant's contentions that his trial counsel was ineffective in that he failed to make certain motions or arguments are unavailing, since "counsel's failure to make an argument that has little or no chance of success" does not constitute ineffectiveness ( People v. Goddard, 72 A.D.3d 839, 840, 898 N.Y.S.2d 637; see People v. DeHaney, 66 A.D.3d 1040, 889 N.Y.S.2d 194). The defendant's remaining contentions in his supplemental pro se brief regarding ineffective assistance of counsel are without merit.
Since the defendant opposed the People's application to submit the charge of manslaughter in the first degree to the jury as a lesser-included offense of murder in the second degree, he waived his present claim that the County Court erred in failing to submit that charge ( cf. People v. Hernandez, 297 A.D.2d 389, 390, 746 N.Y.S.2d 615; People v. Green, 205 A.D.2d 637, 613 N.Y.S.2d 233).
The sentence imposed was not excessive ( see People v....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Gibson
...v. Rivera, 71 N.Y.2d 705, 709, 530 N.Y.S.2d 52, 525 N.E.2d 698;People v. Ingram, 80 A.D.3d at 714, 914 N.Y.S.2d 316;People v. Terrell, 78 A.D.3d 865, 910 N.Y.S.2d 368;People v. Goddard, 72 A.D.3d 839, 840, 898 N.Y.S.2d 637). Furthermore, the record reveals that the defendant received an adv......
-
People v. Deal
...of success does not constitute ineffective assistance ( see People v. Ingram, 80 A.D.3d 713, 714, 914 N.Y.S.2d 316;People v. Terrell, 78 A.D.3d 865, 866, 910 N.Y.S.2d 368;People v. Goddard, 72 A.D.3d 839, 840, 898 N.Y.S.2d 637). The defendant's contention that his plea of guilty was not kno......
-
People v. Shaffer
...assistance of counsel arising from counsel's failure to make a motion that had little or no chance of success ( see People v. Terrell, 78 A.D.3d 865, 910 N.Y.S.2d 368; People v. Goddard, 72 A.D.3d 839, 840, 898 N.Y.S.2d 637; People v. DeHaney, 66 A.D.3d 1040, 1041, 889 N.Y.S.2d 194). Furthe......
-
People v. Ingram
...assistance of counsel arising from counsel's failure to make a motion that had little or no chance of success ( see People v. Terrell, 78 A.D.3d 865, 910 N.Y.S.2d 368; People v. Goddard, 72 A.D.3d 839, 840, 898 N.Y.S.2d 637; People v. DeHaney, 66 A.D.3d 1040, 1041, 889 N.Y.S.2d 194). The de......