People v. Thiel

Decision Date08 October 1969
Citation305 N.Y.S.2d 145,25 N.Y.2d 926,252 N.E.2d 626
Parties, 252 N.E.2d 626 PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Herbert Godfrey THIEL, Jr., Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Appeal from Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, 29 A.D.2d 913, 289 N.Y.S.2d 879.

The defendant was convicted on nine counts of forgery in the second degree and one count of grand larceny in the first degree.

The Herkimer County Court, Edmond A. McCarthy, J., rendered judgment.

The Appellate Division, 26 A.D.2d 897, 274 N.Y.S.2d 417, reversed and granted a new trial.

On second trial defendant was convicted in the Herkimer County Court, Edmond A. McCarthy, J., of eight counts of second degree forgery and one count of second degree grand larceny and was sentenced to terms totalling 15 to 25 years, though at first trial he was sentenced only to terms totalling 10 to 20 years.

The Appellate Division, 29 A.D.2d 913, 289 N.Y.S.2d 879, entered a judgment March 28, 1968 which modified, on the law and the facts and in exercise of discretion, and, as modified, affirmed the judgment of the Herkimer County Court.

The Appellate Division held that at second trial a more severe punishment should not have been inflicted on defendant.

The defendant appealed to the Court of Appeals by permission of an Associate Judge of the Court of Appeals.

Judgment affirmed. The sentence imposed was within the competence of the court. If the defendant is to be given any relief, it must be by way of executive clemency.

All concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • People v. Meurer
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 23 Diciembre 1994
    ...v. Van Pelt, 76 N.Y.2d 156, 556 N.Y.S.2d 984, 556 N.E.2d 423; People v. Thiel, 29 A.D.2d 913, 289 N.Y.S.2d 879, affd. 25 N.Y.2d 926, 305 N.Y.S.2d 145, 252 N.E.2d 626), there is no absolute constitutional bar to imposing a more severe sentence after reconviction (North Carolina v. Pearce, 39......
  • People v. Lebron
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 4 Noviembre 1974
  • People v. Woodruff
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • 8 Octubre 1970
  • People v. Robinson
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 22 Noviembre 1978
    ...of sentence rests with the trial court and should not be disturbed unless there is a clear abuse of discretion (People v. Thiel, 25 N.Y.2d 926, 305 N.Y.S.2d 145, 252 N.E.2d 626; People v. West, 52 A.D.2d 968, 382 N.Y.S.2d 849). The sentence imposed was legally permissible and on such facts ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT