People v. Thompson

Decision Date03 May 2017
Citation51 N.Y.S.3d 429 (Mem),150 A.D.3d 771
Parties The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Christopher THOMPSON, appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Thomas N.N. Angell, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Steven Levine of counsel), for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, N.Y. (Bridget Rahilly Steller of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Greller, J.), imposed March 30, 2015, on the ground that the resentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.

The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

ENG, P.J., HALL, COHEN, LaSALLE and CONNOLLY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. Thomas
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 3, 2017
  • People v. Walker
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 30, 2020
  • Linares v. Suarez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 3, 2017
  • People v. Bryant
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 20, 2017
    ...the resentence was excessive.ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.The resentence imposed was not excessive (see People v. Thompson, 150 A.D.3d 771, 51 N.Y.S.3d 429 ; People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ). ENG, P.J., CHAMBERS, ROMAN, COHEN and HINDS–RADIX, JJ., ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT