People v. Tole
| Decision Date | 26 April 2012 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant, v. Kuidon TOLE, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 03236
94 A.D.3d 1334
942 N.Y.S.2d 295
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Appellant,
v.
Kuidon TOLE, Respondent.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
April 26, 2012.
[942 N.Y.S.2d 295]
James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Bonnie M. Mitzner of counsel), for appellant.
John Ferrara, Monticello, for respondent.
Before: PETERS, P.J., MALONE JR., KAVANAGH, STEIN and EGAN JR., JJ.
MALONE JR., J.
[94 A.D.3d 1334] Appeal from an order of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.),
entered June 15, 2011, which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment.
After defendant was accused of unlawfully possessing contraband while an inmate at the Sullivan County Jail, the People served, by mail, a grand jury notice on defendant's counsel approximately one week prior to presentment, informing him that written notice of defendant's intent to testify before the grand jury was due no later than one day prior to presentment. The People did not receive such notice from defendant and an indictment was subsequently filed charging defendant with promoting prison contraband in the first degree. At arraignment, defendant argued that he had intended to testify before the grand jury but that he had not received the grand jury notice that had been forwarded to him by counsel until after presentment and, on that basis, defendant moved to dismiss the indictment. County Court ultimately granted defendant's motion, and the People appeal. We reverse.
The People provided defendant with sufficient notice of the grand jury presentment by sending notice to defense counsel [94 A.D.3d 1335] approximately one week before presentment ( see CPL 190.50[5][a]; People v. Ballard, 13 A.D.3d 670, 671, 785 N.Y.S.2d 608 [2004], lv. denied 4 N.Y.3d 796, 795 N.Y.S.2d 171, 828 N.E.2d 87 [2005]; People v. Crisp, 246 A.D.2d 84, 86–87, 677 N.Y.S.2d 356 [1998] ). The fact that counsel did not relay the notice to defendant “within that time does not render the People's notice unreasonable” ( People v. Ballard, 13 A.D.3d at 671, 785 N.Y.S.2d 608; see People v. Choi, 210 A.D.2d 495, 496–497, 620 N.Y.S.2d 131 [1994] ).1 because the people did not receive timELY WRITTEN NOTICE OF defendant's intention to testify, the indictment was properly obtained ( see People v. Ballard, 13 A.D.3d at 671, 785 N.Y.S.2d 608) and defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment should not have been granted ( see People v. Choi, 210 A.D.2d at...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Stahl
...A.D.3d 1096, 1097, 983 N.Y.S.2d 329 [2014], lv. denied 24 N.Y.3d 1045, 998 N.Y.S.2d 315, 23 N.E.3d 158 [2014] ; People v. Tole, 94 A.D.3d 1334, 1334–1335, 942 N.Y.S.2d 295 [2012], lv. denied 19 N.Y.3d 968, 950 N.Y.S.2d 120, 973 N.E.2d 218 [2012] ; People v. Caban, 89 A.D.3d 1321, 1322, 932 ......
-
People v. Tole
...not received proper grand jury notice, this Court reversed that order and ordered that the indictment be reinstated (94 A.D.3d 1334, 1334–1335, 942 N.Y.S.2d 295 [2012],lv. denied19 N.Y.3d 968, 950 N.Y.S.2d 120, 973 N.E.2d 218 [2012] ). Following reinstatement of the indictment, but prior to......
-
People v. Wilkerson
...defendant failed to timely notify the People in writing of his intention to appear before the grand jury (see People v. Tole, 94 A.D.3d 1334, 1335, 942 N.Y.S.2d 295 [2012], lv. denied 19 N.Y.3d 968, 950 N.Y.S.2d 120, 973 N.E.2d 218 [2012] ; People v. Hernandez, 42 A.D.3d 657, 662, 839 N.Y.S......
-
People v. Abraham
...to evidence regarding the mortgage on the property did not constitute an improper attempt to introduce a new theory of liability on the [94 A.D.3d 1334] insurance fraud count, as defendant asserts. That evidence was mentioned in both opening statements and explored at length during the tria......