People v. Torres
| Decision Date | 18 January 2018 |
| Docket Number | 107799 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Luis TORRES, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
George P. Ferro, Albany, for appellant.
James R. Farrell, District Attorney, Monticello (Meagan K. Galligan of counsel), for respondent.
Before: Garry, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr., Clark and Rumsey, JJ.
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Sullivan County (LaBuda, J.), rendered July 17, 2014, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree.
In satisfaction of a two-count indictment, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and waived his right to appeal. Under the terms of the plea agreement, he was to be sentenced as a second violent felony offender to anywhere from seven to 11 years in prison, to be followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Prior to sentencing, defendant absconded to Florida and a warrant was issued for his arrest. When he was returned to New York, County Court sentenced him to 8½ years in prison and five years of postrelease supervision. He now appeals.
Appellate counsel seeks to be relieved of his assignment of representing defendant on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Upon reviewing the record, however, we find that there is an issue of arguable merit pertaining to the validity of the waiver of the right to appeal that may impact other issues, such as the severity of the sentence (see People v. Lopez, 6 N.Y.3d 248, 256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 [2006] ; see also People v. Kruppenbacher, 154 A.D.3d 1059, 1060, 61 N.Y.S.3d 923 [2017] ). Therefore, without deciding the ultimate merits of this issue, we grant counsel's application for leave to withdraw and assign new counsel to address this issue and any others that the record may disclose (see People v. Stokes, 95 N.Y.2d 633, 722 N.Y.S.2d 217, 744 N.E.2d 1153 [2001] ; People v. Cruwys, 113 A.D.2d 979, 980, 493 N.Y.S.2d 653 [1985], lv denied 67 N.Y.2d 650, 499 N.Y.S.2d 1046, 490 N.E.2d 562 [1986] ).
ORDERED that the decision is withheld, application to be relieved of assignment granted and new counsel to be assigned.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Lopez
...discernible from the ... record" ( People v. Santiago , 22 N.Y.3d 900, 903, 977 N.Y.S.2d 144, 999 N.E.2d 507 [2013] ; see Sumter , 157 A.D.3d at 1126, 70 N.Y.S.3d 253 ). Here, the record establishes that the predicate felony was based on defendant's previous conviction in federal court of c......
-
People v. Mastro
...degree that it implicates the voluntariness of defendant's guilty plea – is similarly unpreserved for our review (see People v. Sumter, 157 A.D.3d at 1126, 70 N.Y.S.3d 253 ). Defendant's remaining arguments on that point, including his assertion that counsel failed to properly investigate p......
-
People v. Lopez
...when a sentence's illegality is readily discernible from the... record" (People v Santiago, 22 N.Y.3d 900, 903 [2013]; see Sumter, 157 A.D.3d at 1126). Here, the record establishes that the predicate felony was based on defendant's previous conviction in federal court of conspiracy to posse......
-
People v. Mais
...plea colloquy that were inconsistent with his guilt (see People v. Milligan , 165 A.D.3d at 1347, 85 N.Y.S.3d 616 ; People v. Sumter , 157 A.D.3d at 1126, 70 N.Y.S.3d 253 ). Finally, although defendant's ineffective assistance of counsel claim survives the appeal waiver to the extent that i......