People v. Torres

Decision Date30 September 1981
Docket Number79-669,Nos. 79-668,s. 79-668
Citation100 Ill.App.3d 931,427 N.E.2d 329,56 Ill.Dec. 249
Parties, 56 Ill.Dec. 249 PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jose TORRES and Miguel Trinidad, Defendants-Appellants.
CourtUnited States Appellate Court of Illinois

Glenn E. Gutsche, Chicago, for Jose Torres.

Sheldon L. Banks, Chicago, for Miguel Trinidad.

Bernard Carey, State's Atty., Chicago (Marcia B. Orr, Myra J. Brown, Mark A. Graf, Asst. State's Attys., Chicago, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellee.

McGILLICUDDY, Justice:

Jose Torres and Miguel Trinidad, the defendants, were charged by indictment with attempt murder and aggravated battery. At a bench trial they were convicted of reckless conduct and were sentenced to 364 days imprisonment.

The defendants raise the following issues on appeal: (1) whether they were convicted of reckless conduct beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) whether the trial court erred in denying a motion to suppress identification testimony; and (3) whether the sentences imposed upon them were excessive.

At trial, Marie Barmes testified that at 7:30 p. m. on October 10, 1976 when she was twelve years old, she was outside of her home at 5200 South Bishop with Ann Marie Zellinski, Brian Zellinski and Mary Skwarczyk. Bishop Street was a southbound one-way street. Marie was standing with Mary on 52nd Street near the north side of the house. Ann Marie and Brian were playing on the grass on 52nd Street near Bishop. As Marie was writing her name on the side of her house, she observed a yellow Nova automobile on 52nd Street coming towards her. She noticed the car for a few seconds and last saw it as it approached the curb at the corner of 52nd Street and Bishop. While she continued to write her name, she heard a firecracker-like noise, felt a tingling sensation in her legs and saw blood. Marie was taken to the hospital and a bullet was removed from her right leg.

Marie was unable to identify her assailants and could not state how many people were in the car. It was dark outside at the time of the incident.

Ann Marie Zellinski, who was also twelve years old at the time of the incident, testified that when Marie was shot, she was wrestling with her brother by the Barmes house on the grass outside the sidewalk near the street. Ann Marie was about two to four feet from Bishop Street and two feet from 52nd Street. It was dark outside at this time. Ann Marie first noticed a yellow or lime colored Nova travelling eastbound on 52nd Street when it was seven feet from her. She knew the car was a Nova because her friends, John Sternquist and Clayton Sims, drove Novas.

Ann Marie further testified that it took approximately two minutes for the car to travel the two blocks and to turn south in front of the Barmes house. For ten seconds, as the car passed by her, she observed two male Puerto Ricans or Latinos who she identified as the defendants. The car stayed in front of the house for thirty seconds with the passenger side nearest to the curb. While the car was parked, Ann Marie heard a firecracker-like noise. She looked at Marie and then at the car. The passenger in the car had his arms out of the front window holding a black colored gun. Ann Marie identified the gun at trial and said she was two to four feet from the car when she saw the gun. She could not say where each of the defendants were sitting in the front seat of the car and could not say who fired the gun.

Ann Marie testified that, after the shooting, she heard laughter and conversation, in a language she did not understand, coming from the car. After Marie fell to the ground, the car pulled away rapidly from the curb, and travelled south on Bishop and east on 53rd Street. About two minutes later, the police arrived.

Ann Marie stated that she could not give the police a description of the assailants' clothing or their facial characteristics. She told the police officers that one of the offenders had curly hair and that the other had an Afro-like hairdo which was pushed back. She denied saying that the offenders might be white males and did not remember telling the officers that the offenders were 19 or 20 years old. Ann Marie stated at trial that the offenders were in their thirties.

Ann Marie further testified that, on the night of the shooting, she was brought to the police station and was told to look into a room where the offenders were present. When she looked into the room she did not see the offenders but she saw two Caucasian men, who she thought were plainclothes police officers, sitting at a desk. She could not see the entire room. Ann Marie did not make any identifications of the defendants until the preliminary hearing. While at the station, she observed a light green Nova with bullet holes in the door and stated that that car was similar to the one the offenders had driven.

On cross-examination, Ann Marie said she first saw the Nova automobile when it was two blocks to the west. She admitted that at the preliminary hearing she testified that she first saw the car when it was in front of the Barmes house. She did not remember stating at the preliminary hearing that the car was parked when she first observed it. Ann Marie also admitted that at the preliminary hearing she said she could see the faces of the car occupants when the car was stopped in front of the house.

David Ryan, a tactical officer for the Chicago Police Department, testified that on October 10, 1976, at about 7:50 p. m., he responded to a radio call that a girl had been shot on the southwest corner of 52nd Street and Bishop. Based on what he had been told by the people at the scene, he sent a radio message regarding a gold colored Nova containing two male Puerto Ricans that was southbound from 5200 South Bishop.

Officer Jerry Katauskas of the Chicago Police Department Special Operations Group testified that at about 7:50 p. m., on October 10, 1976, he and his partner were patrolling an area approximately nine blocks from 5200 South Bishop. They heard the radio call and subsequently observed a vehicle fitting the description travelling southbound on Ashland Avenue. After the vehicle pulled to the curb, at 5504 South Ashland Avenue, Officer Katauskas and his partner approached the occupants. Officer Katauskas identified defendant Trinidad as the driver of the car and defendant Torres as the passenger. A gun holster was observed on the center hump of the Nova's floor between the passenger's seat and the driver's seat. Officer Katauskas searched the Nova and discovered a loaded .32 caliber semiautomatic handgun under the dashboard on the extreme left side. The defendants were arrested. Officer Katauskas testified that he believed he and his partner took the defendants and the handgun to the tactical office for processing. He stated that he did not see Ann Marie Zellinski in the tactical office that night. Officer Katauskas also testified that other policemen, including some in plain clothes, were present in the office and that, from where he was sitting, the doorway to the room could not be seen in its entirety.

Officer Louis Velez of the Chicago Police Department testified that at about 8 p. m. on October 10, 1976 he arrived at 55th and Ashland and spoke to Officer Katauskas. He then approached the defendants and, in Spanish, informed them of the reason for their detention. Velez stated that he handcuffed the defendants and placed them in the rear of his vehicle and took them to the police station. While in the police car, defendant Trinidad told Velez that the Nova and handgun belonged to him and that the gun had been test fired earlier that evening in the back of his store.

Officer Joseph Garofalo of the Chicago Police Department testified that on October 10, 1976 he and his partner responded to a call at 5200 South Bishop. He remained at the scene for approximately ten minutes and then toured the area. Later that evening he took Ann Marie Zellinski and her mother to the police station to view the defendants. Ann Marie went to the door of the tactical office, looked into the room and did not recognize anyone. Garofalo testified that he stood next to her and could not see the entire office. Garofalo did not know the identity of the two Caucasian men sitting at the desk in the room.

On cross-examination, Garofalo testified that Ann Marie described the occupants of the Nova as being two male Puerto Ricans and that she did not give a description of the offenders' hair. He admitted that the report he prepared indicated that Ann Marie said the offenders were either 19 or 20 years of age.

Sergeant Donald Smith of the Firearms Identification Section, Criminalistics Division of the Chicago Police Department, testified that he examined a .32 caliber bullet recovered from Marie Barmes' leg and that he made a microscopic comparison of that bullet with bullets that had been test fired from the .32 caliber semiautomatic gun that had been recovered by the police from the Nova automobile. Smith concluded that the bullet recovered from Marie Barmes' leg was fired from the .32 caliber gun.

On cross-examination, Smith testified that he did not perform certain comparative tests described by defendants' counsel. He also stated that his written report regarding the instant case listed class but not individual characteristic similarities between the test fired bullets and the bullet recovered from Barmes' leg.

At the close of the State's case, the parties stipulated that defendant Trinidad was 38 years old and defendant Torres was 52 years old.

As a defense witness, Investigator Raymond Latimer of the Chicago Police Department testified that he prepared a report regarding the shooting of Marie Barmes. The report described the offenders as "two unknown male white or male Puerto Ricans." This report was written before Latimer interviewed Ann Marie and was based upon descriptions given to Latimer by another police officer. Latimer denied telling the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • People v. Green
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • November 14, 1988
    ...of weighing the credibility of the witnesses and resolving those conflicts and inconsistencies. (People v. Torres (1981), 100 Ill.App.3d 931, 56 Ill.Dec. 249, 427 N.E.2d 329.) We find, as apparently did the trial court, that any number of reasons could explain why Brooks only saw two men. F......
  • People v. Miscichowski, 2-85-0240
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • May 14, 1986
    ...Ill.Dec. 465, 452 N.E.2d 718; People v. Watson (1982), 106 Ill.App.3d 315, 62 Ill.Dec. 425, 436 N.E.2d 7; People v. Torres (1981), 100 Ill.App.3d 931, 56 Ill.Dec. 249, 427 N.E.2d 329.) If the evidence shows that defendant was present at the scene of the offense without disapproving or oppos......
  • People v. McBounds
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • February 22, 1989
    ...evidence is only conflicting, a reviewing court will not substitute its judgment for the trier of fact. (People v. Torres (1981), 100 Ill.App.3d 931, 56 Ill.Dec. 249, 427 N.E.2d 329.) In addition, guilt by accountability is governed by section 5-2 of the Criminal Code. (Ill.Rev.Stat.1983, c......
  • People v. Underwood
    • United States
    • United States Appellate Court of Illinois
    • August 30, 1982
    ...together with other circumstances in determining whether that individual should be held accountable. (People v. Torres (1981), 100 Ill.App.3d 931, 938, 56 Ill.Dec. 249, 427 N.E.2d 329.) One may be held accountable for the acts of another without having actively participated in the overt act......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT