People v. United Air Lines

Citation42 Cal.2d 878,268 P.2d 745
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
Decision Date02 April 1954
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. UNITED AIR LINES, Inc., a corporation, Defendant and Respondent. S. F. 18900.

Appeal from Superior Court, San Mateo County; Edmund Scott, Judge.

Everett C. McKeage and J. Thomason Phelps, San Francisco, for appellant.

Treadwell & Laughlin, Edward F. Treadwell, Reginald S. Laughlin, Colin C. Kelley, San Francisco, Mayer, Meyer, Austrian & Platt, John T. Lorch and Edmund A. Stephan, Chicago, Ill., for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to the complaint had been sustained without leave to amend. This defendant concedes that the Public Utilities Commission has the power of regulatory control over transportation companies by direct grant from the state constitution. Otherwise the issues are the same as those involved in the case of People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., Cal.Sup., 268 P.2d 723. The concession does not affect the result.

The judgment is reversed.

SCHAUER, Justice (dissenting).

For the reasons and upon the grounds stated in my dissenting opinion in People v. Western Air Lines, Inc., Cal.Sup. 268 P.2d 723, this day filed, I would affirm the judgment.

EDMONDS, J., concurs.

Rehearing denied; EDMONDS and SCHAUER, JJ., dissenting.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • People v. Western Air Lines
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • April 2, 1954
    ...at the instance of the Public Utilities Commission as authorized by section 2104 of that code. Companion cases are People v. United Air Lines, Inc., Cal.Sup., 268 P.2d 745, and People v. California Central Air Lines, Cal.Sup., 268 P.2d After setting forth the status of the Public Utilities ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT