People v. Vasquez
Decision Date | 17 December 1985 |
Citation | 498 N.Y.S.2d 788,66 N.Y.2d 968,489 N.E.2d 757 |
Parties | , 489 N.E.2d 757 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Louis VASQUEZ, Appellant. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 106 A.D.2d 327, 483 N.Y.S.2d 244, should be affirmed.
While defendant on this appeal complains that the police officer, by leaning into the car through an open window, violated his Fourth Amendment rights, the question presented to the suppression court, and ruled on by that court, was whether defendant's rights were violated by the officer's opening of the car door and reaching into the automobile to recover a weapon.Defendant's failure to preserve his present argument, by specifically placing it for disposition before the suppression court, leaves no basis for our review.Defendant's alternative...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
People v. John
...box, since that specific argument was not raised to the suppression court, it is beyond our review (see People v. Vasquez, 66 N.Y.2d 968, 970, 498 N.Y.S.2d 788, 489 N.E.2d 757 [1985] ). Defendant's remaining argument is that the admission into evidence of the laboratory reports violated his......
-
People v. Nelson
...for our review (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. Miranda , 27 N.Y.3d 931, 932–933, 50 N.E.3d 224 [2016] ; People v. Vasquez , 66 N.Y.2d 968, 968, 498 N.Y.S.2d 788, 489 N.E.2d 757 [1985], cert. denied 475 U.S. 1109, 106 S.Ct. 1517, 89 L.Ed.2d 916 [1986] ; People v. Minori , 51 N.Y.2d 930, 931, ......
-
People v. John
...box, since that specific argument was not raised to the suppression court, it is beyond our review (see People v. Vasquez, 66 N.Y.2d 968, 970, 498 N.Y.S.2d 788, 489 N.E.2d 757 [1985] ). Defendant's remaining argument is that the admission into evidence of the laboratory reports violated his......
-
People v. Bradshaw
...the time of the lineup, he was not lawfully in police custody because the Queens arrest was unlawful ( see People v. Vasquez, 66 N.Y.2d 968, 970, 498 N.Y.S.2d 788, 489 N.E.2d 757, cert. denied 475 U.S. 1109, 106 S.Ct. 1517, 89 L.Ed.2d 916; People v. Volpe, 60 N.Y.2d 803, 805, 469 N.Y.S.2d 6......