People v. Vega

Decision Date20 November 1989
PartiesThe PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Alex VEGA, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Philip L. Weinstein, New York City (Beverly Van Ness, of counsel), for appellant.

Elizabeth Holtzman, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Barbara D. Underwood, Peter A. Weinstein and Nikki Kowalski, of counsel), for respondent.

Before MANGANO, J.P., and LAWRENCE, KOOPER and BALLETTA, JJ.

MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lombardo, J.), rendered May 21, 1986, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), and robbery in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We reject the defendant's contention that his felony murder conviction must be reversed because there was insufficient evidence from which the jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that he formed the intent to commit robbery prior to killing the victim. The trial court properly instructed the jury that, in order to convict the defendant of felony murder it was required to find, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he committed or attempted to commit robbery and, in the course of and in furtherance of such crime, or in immediate flight therefrom, he caused the death of a person other than one of the participants. The jury decided this issue in favor of the People and there was sufficient evidence presented at trial to support this determination. By his own statement, the defendant admitted that he bound and gagged the victim before he was apprehended filling his pockets with the decedent's jewelry. As there would be no need to gag a dead person and the testimony of the medical examiner was that the gag was a contributing factor to the death by asphyxiation, we find that the proof adduced at trial permitted the inference to be drawn that the defendant formulated the intent to commit the robbery prior to his killing the decedent. A jury's resolution of the facts should not be disturbed unless clearly unsupported by the evidence (see, People v. Barnes, 50 N.Y.2d 375, 429 N.Y.S.2d 178, 406 N.E.2d 1071; People v. Shakoor, 112 A.D.2d 258, 491 N.Y.S.2d 705; People v. Reynolds, 107 A.D.2d 724, 484 N.Y.S.2d 81).

Any error in the court's refusal to charge manslaughter in the second degree (reckless manslaughter) and criminally negligent homicide as lesser included offenses of murder in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • People v. McIntosh
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • June 15, 2018
    ...A.D.2d 824, 826, 710 N.Y.S.2d 214 [4th Dept. 2000], lv denied 95 N.Y.2d 893, 715 N.Y.S.2d 386, 738 N.E.2d 790 [2000] ; People v. Vega, 155 A.D.2d 632, 633, 547 N.Y.S.2d 679 [2d Dept. 1989], lv denied 75 N.Y.2d 819, 552 N.Y.S.2d 569, 551 N.E.2d 1247 [1990] ).Here, the court charged the jury ......
  • People v. Edwards, 2014–08534
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 4, 2018
    ...v. Beriguete , 51 A.D.3d 939, 939–940, 858 N.Y.S.2d 369 ; People v. Powers , 231 A.D.2d 744, 744, 648 N.Y.S.2d 119 ; People v. Vega , 155 A.D.2d 632, 633, 547 N.Y.S.2d 679 ; see also People v. McGeachy , 74 A.D.3d 989, 989, 902 N.Y.S.2d 186 ).The defendant's contentions, raised in his pro s......
  • People v. Tellone
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 20, 1989
  • People v. Vega
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • January 23, 1990
    ...569 552 N.Y.S.2d 569 75 N.Y.2d 819, 551 N.E.2d 1247 People v. Vega (Alex) COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK JAN 23, 1990 Simons, J. 155 A.D.2d 632, 547 N.Y.S.2d 679 App.Div. 2, Kings Denied ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT