People v. Walker

• Decision Date: 24 June 2020
• Docket Number: Ind. No. 8363/12,2014–10253
• Citation: 124 N.Y.S.3d 223 (Mem),184 A.D.3d 881
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., respondent, v. Dean WALKER, appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

184 A.D.3d 881

124 N.Y.S.3d 223 (Mem)

The PEOPLE, etc., respondent,

v.Dean WALKER, appellant.

2014–10253

Ind. No. 8363/12

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted—May 6, 2020

June 24, 2020

Paul Skip Laisure, New York, N.Y. (Michael Arthus of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas M. Ross of counsel; Robert Ho on the memorandum), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., LEONARD B. AUSTIN, SHERI S. ROMAN, SYLVIA O. HINDS–RADIX, LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by her motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Matthew D'Emic, J.), imposed September 23, 2014, upon her plea of guilty, on the ground that the period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The period of postrelease supervision imposed as part of the sentence was not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80, 455 N.Y.S.2d 675 ).

DILLON, J.P., AUSTIN, ROMAN, HINDS–RADIX and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.