People v. Walker

• Decision Date: 24 December 2019
• Docket Number: Ind. No. 3832/15,2016-04669
• Citation: 178 A.D.3d 1094,112 N.Y.S.3d 542 (Mem)
• Parties: The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Kajun WALKER, Appellant.
• Court: New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

178 A.D.3d 1094

112 N.Y.S.3d 542 (Mem)

The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent,

v.Kajun WALKER, Appellant.

2016-04669

Ind. No. 3832/15

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Submitted—November 20, 2019

December 24, 2019

Janet E. Sabel, New York, N.Y. (Jeffrey Dellheim of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Gamaliel Marrero of counsel; Marielle Burnett on the memorandum), for respondent.

WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P., JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, ROBERT J. MILLER, COLLEEN D. DUFFY, HECTOR D. LASALLE, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Sanders , 25 N.Y.3d 337, 341, 12 N.Y.S.3d 593, 34 N.E.3d 344 ; People v. Ramos , 7 N.Y.3d 737, 738, 819 N.Y.S.2d 853, 853 N.E.2d 222 ; People v. Batista , 167 A.D.3d 69, 73, 86 N.Y.S.3d 492 ). The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the period of postrelease supervision imposed was excessive (see People v. Lopez , 6 N.Y.3d 248, 255–256, 811 N.Y.S.2d 623, 844 N.E.2d 1145 ).

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, MILLER, DUFFY and LASALLE, JJ., concur.