People v. Watson, 2370.
Decision Date | 17 February 2004 |
Docket Number | 2370. |
Citation | 2004 NY Slip Op 00985,771 N.Y.S.2d 639,4 A.D.3d 174 |
Parties | THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK WATSON, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Defendant's application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79 [1986]) was properly denied as the record supports the trial court's determination that defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of intentional discrimination in the prosecution's exercise of its peremptory challenges (People v Brown, 97 NY2d 500, 507-508 [2002]; People v Williams, 301 AD2d 369 [2003], lv denied 99 NY2d 659 [2003]). Defendant's numerical argument was not so compelling as to be conclusive (see People v Walker, 306 AD2d 56, 56 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 600 [2003]; People v Truesdale, 299 AD2d 289, 290 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 659 [2003]).
We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In the Matter of Newsday, Inc.
... ... Access under the common law was also properly denied (see People v Burton, 189 AD2d 532, 535-536 [1993]; and see Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc., 435 US 589, ... ...
- Sarigul v. New York Telephone Company