People v. Watson, 2370.

Decision Date17 February 2004
Docket Number2370.
Citation2004 NY Slip Op 00985,771 N.Y.S.2d 639,4 A.D.3d 174
PartiesTHE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. MARK WATSON, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Defendant's application pursuant to Batson v Kentucky (476 US 79 [1986]) was properly denied as the record supports the trial court's determination that defendant failed to make a prima facie showing of intentional discrimination in the prosecution's exercise of its peremptory challenges (People v Brown, 97 NY2d 500, 507-508 [2002]; People v Williams, 301 AD2d 369 [2003], lv denied 99 NY2d 659 [2003]). Defendant's numerical argument was not so compelling as to be conclusive (see People v Walker, 306 AD2d 56, 56 [2003], lv denied 100 NY2d 600 [2003]; People v Truesdale, 299 AD2d 289, 290 [2002], lv denied 99 NY2d 659 [2003]).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.

Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Andrias and Williams, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • In the Matter of Newsday, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 February 2004
    ... ...         Access under the common law was also properly denied (see People v Burton, 189 AD2d 532, 535-536 [1993]; and see Nixon v Warner Communications, Inc., 435 US 589, ... ...
  • Sarigul v. New York Telephone Company
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 February 2004

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT