People v. Watson
| Decision Date | 30 October 1997 |
| Citation | 663 N.Y.S.2d 564,243 A.D.2d 426 |
| Parties | , 1997 N.Y. Slip Op. 9361 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Shane WATSON, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Robert F. Petrone, for Respondent.
Katheryne M. Martone, for Defendant-Appellant.
Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and MILONAS, WALLACH, WILLIAMS and COLABELLA, JJ.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Gerald Sheindlin, J.), rendered November 23, 1993, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing him, to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The court properly exercised its discretion in restricting defendant's proposed cross-examination of a People's witness (see, People v. Schwartzman, 24 N.Y.2d 241, 244, 299 N.Y.S.2d 817, 247 N.E.2d 642, cert. denied 396 U.S. 846, 90 S.Ct. 103, 24 L.Ed.2d 96; People v. Sorge, 301 N.Y. 198, 200-202, 93 N.E.2d 637) as an attempt to impeach the witness's assertion on a collateral matter with extrinsic evidence (People v. Pavao, 59 N.Y.2d 282, 288-289, 464 N.Y.S.2d 458, 451 N.E.2d 216). Additionally, defendant's offer of proof was based on hearsay and speculation and the court properly determined that the probative value of the matters sought to be elicited was outweighed by the danger that the issues before the jury would be obscured (see, People v. Quinones, 210 A.D.2d 176, 177, 620 N.Y.S.2d 960).
The existing record, viewed as a whole and in light of the course of conduct of the court and counsel (see, People v. Styles, 237 A.D.2d 206, 655 N.Y.S.2d 931, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 864, 661 N.Y.S.2d 191, 683 N.E.2d 1065), sufficiently establishes that the challenged portions of the voir dire occurred in the courtroom after the court excused all individuals not concerned, and that defendant was actually present (see, People v. Snow, 237 A.D.2d 118, 654 N.Y.S.2d 744, lv. denied 90 N.Y.2d 864, 661 N.Y.S.2d 191, 683 N.E.2d 1065).
The court properly discharged a sworn juror as grossly unqualified to continue service (People v. O'Kane, 224 A.D.2d 182, 637 N.Y.S.2d 384, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 939, 647 N.Y.S.2d 173, 670 N.E.2d 457). The court properly concluded, based on the totality of the juror's responses, the court's observation of the juror's demeanor, and the fact that a friend of defendant had approached the juror, asserting defendant's innocence, that the juror possessed a state of mind that would prevent her from rendering an impartial verdict (People v. Rodriguez, 71 N.Y.2d 214, 219, 524 N.Y.S.2d 422, 519 N.E.2d 333). There was no prejudice to defendant from the fact that the juror's statements...
To continue reading
Request your trial
- ACC Concrete Corp. v. Core Cont'l Constr., LLC
-
People v. Spencer
...of an impartial verdict” (CPL § 270.351; People v. Buford, 69 N.Y.2d 290, 298, 514 N.Y.S.2d 191, 506 N.E.2d 901 1987; People v. Watson, 243 A.D.2d 426, 663 N.Y.S.2d 564 1st Dept.1997, lv. denied 92 N.Y.2d 863, 677 N.Y.S.2d 94, 699 N.E.2d 454 1998 ). The trial court properly concluded, based......
-
Watson v. Artuz, 99 Civ. 1364 (PAE) (GWG)
...in the interest of justice. See Def. Appeal Br. at 23–60. The Appellate Division affirmed the conviction. People v. Watson, 243 A.D.2d 426, 426, 663 N.Y.S.2d 564 (1st Dep't 1997). The Court of Appeals of New York denied Watson's request for leave to appeal. People v. Watson, 92 N.Y.2d 863, ......
-
People v. Watson, 7806–1991.
...On October 30, 1997, the Appellate Division, First Department, unanimously affirmed the judgment of conviction (see People v. Watson, 243 A.D.2d 426 [1st Dept 1997] ). On June 29, 1998, the Court of Appeals denied defendant's application for leave to appeal from the Appellate Division (Levi......