People v. Wedgewood
Decision Date | 31 December 1984 |
Citation | 106 A.D.2d 674,483 N.Y.S.2d 440 |
Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Russell WEDGEWOOD, Appellant. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Darrin Berger, Huntington, for appellant.
Patrick Henry, Dist. Atty., Riverhead (Gabrielle Weglein, Asst. Dist. Atty., Hauppauge, of counsel; Stephen L. O'Brien, Riverhead, on brief), for respondent.
Before LAZER, J.P., and THOMPSON, WEINSTEIN and EIBER, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County, rendered August 25, 1983, convicting him of attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
Judgment reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, plea vacated, and case remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings on the indictment.
Defendant was initially charged with criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree. The charge stemmed from an altercation between defendant and two of his neighbors during which defendant allegedly strayed from his property with a gun visibly tucked into his waistband. He moved to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the evidence presented to the Grand Jury was insufficient to support the charge in that it revealed a legal impediment to obtaining a conviction, namely, that since the gun in question was a muzzle loading revolver which employed a percussion cap ignition system, and was not loaded at the time of the altercation, it was to be classified an "Antique firearm" pursuant to subdivision 14 of section 265.00 of the Penal Law. Since an "Antique firearm" is not a "firearm" (see Penal Law, § 265.00, subd. 3), and the latter is a necessary element of the crime of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (see Penal Law, § 265.03), defendant reasoned that he could not possibly be convicted of that crime.
In the interim, the People resubmitted the case to the Grand Jury, which returned a superseding indictment charging defendant with attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and two counts of menacing. Defendant entered a plea of not guilty to all four counts.
Upon defendant's motion, the County Court dismissed count two, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, because "the gun in question being an antique firearm and though operational, was not loaded at the time in question".
Defendant's motion was denied with respect to the remaining three counts.
Subsequently, after some equivocation, defendant expressed a desire before the court to withdraw his previously entered plea of not guilty, and instead to plead guilty to attempted criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree in full satisfaction of the remaining three counts of the indictment. Nonetheless, he insisted that the gun in question had not been loaded at the time of the altercation. During the ensuing change of plea proceeding, the following colloquy took place between the court, the Assistant District Attorney and the defendant:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
People v. Gerald
...defendant's application should have been granted outright without further inquiry (see e.g. People v Shipman, 14 N.Y.2d 883; People v Wedgewood, 106 A.D.2d 674). Therefore, reversing the judgment of conviction, I would remit the matter for further proceedings consistent with People v Tinsle......
-
People v. Gerald
...outright without further inquiry (see e.g. People v. Shipman, 14 N.Y.2d 883, 252 N.Y.S.2d 88, 200 N.E.2d 773 ; People v. Wedgewood, 106 A.D.2d 674, 483 N.Y.S.2d 440 ). Therefore, upon reversing the judgment of conviction, I would remit the matter for further proceedings consistent with Peop......
-
People v. Bouges
...393 U.S. 1067, 89 S.Ct. 721, 21 L.Ed.2d 709; People v. Serrano, 15 N.Y.2d 304, 258 N.Y.S.2d 386, 206 N.E.2d 330; People v. Wedgewood, 106 A.D.2d 674, 676-677, 483 N.Y.S.2d 440). The court failed to make further inquiry upon defendant's protestations of innocence of the crime of attempted mu......
-
People v. Langhorn
...as he may wish to avoid the risk of conviction upon a trial of the more serious crime charged in the indictment (People v. Wedgewood, 106 A.D.2d 674, 676, 483 N.Y.S.2d 440). "In the instant case, the defendant heard a recitation of the prosecution's evidence against him and was afforded the......