People v. West
Decision Date | 04 May 1982 |
Citation | 56 N.Y.2d 662,436 N.E.2d 1313,451 N.Y.S.2d 711 |
Parties | , 436 N.E.2d 1313 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Ronald WEST, Appellant. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
The order of the Appellate Division, 80 A.D.2d 754, 437 N.Y.S.2d 213, should be affirmed.
Defendant contends that reversible error occurred when the trial court permitted two witnesses to bolster the victim's prior identification of the defendant. (See People v. Trowbridge, 305 N.Y. 471, 113 N.E.2d 841.) Although a general protest was raised against this testimony, defendant at no time objected to this testimony on the specific ground that it constituted improper bolstering. Thus, defendant has failed to preserve this issue for appellate review. (See People v. Gonzalez, 55 N.Y.2d 720, 722, 447 N.Y.S.2d 145, 431 N.E.2d 630; see, also, People v. Vidal, 26 N.Y.2d 249, 254, 309 N.Y.S.2d 336, 257 N.E.2d 886; Richardson, Evidence § 538.)
We have examined defendant's remaining contentions and have found them to be without merit.
Order affirmed in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rolling v. Fischer, 05 Civ. 7063(GWG).
...N.E.2d 919 (1995); accord People v. Fleming, 70 N.Y.2d 947, 948, 524 N.Y.S.2d 670, 519 N.E.2d 616 (1988); People v. West, 56 N.Y.2d 662, 663, 451 N.Y.S.2d 711, 436 N.E.2d 1313 (1982). Thus, state case law indicates that "compliance with the rule was demanded in the specific circumstances pr......
-
People v. Miller
...v. Butler, 2 A.D.3d 1457, 1458, 769 N.Y.S.2d 768,lv. denied3 N.Y.3d 637, 782 N.Y.S.2d 408, 816 N.E.2d 198;see People v. West, 56 N.Y.2d 662, 663, 451 N.Y.S.2d 711, 436 N.E.2d 1313;People v. Comerford, 70 A.D.3d 1305, 1306, 895 N.Y.S.2d 621). In any event, because the statements made by the ......
-
People v. Wilborn
...regard, and, therefore, failed to properly preserve this contention for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2] ; People v. West, 56 N.Y.2d 662, 663, 451 N.Y.S.2d 711, 436 N.E.2d 1313 ; see also People v. Hercules, 47 A.D.3d 835, 836, 850 N.Y.S.2d 535 ). In any event, we agree with the court's ......
-
People v. Vasquez
...evidence is unpreserved as he did not contemporaneously object to their admission on this ground (see People v. West, 56 N.Y.2d 662, 663, 451 N.Y.S.2d 711, 436 N.E.2d 1313 [1982] ; People v. Sloley, 179 A.D.3d 1308, 1311, 117 N.Y.S.3d 373 [3d Dept. 2020], lv denied 35 N.Y.3d 974, 125 N.Y.S.......