People v. White, 392 KA 11-00290

Decision Date08 May 2015
Docket Number392 KA 11-00290
Citation8 N.Y.S.3d 788,128 A.D.3d 1457,2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 03963
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Jarrett T. WHITE, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

128 A.D.3d 1457
8 N.Y.S.3d 788
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 03963

The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent
v.
Jarrett T. WHITE, Defendant–Appellant.

392 KA 11-00290

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

May 8, 2015.


8 N.Y.S.3d 789

Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (James A. Hobbs of Counsel), for Defendant–Appellant.

Sandra Doorley, District Attorney, Rochester (Daniel Gross of Counsel), for Respondent.

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND SCONIERS, JJ.

Opinion

MEMORANDUM:

128 A.D.3d 1458

On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16[1] ) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (§ 220.06[5] ), defendant contends that County Court erred in refusing to suppress the drugs seized from his person because he was subject to an illegal search, and that his statements to a police investigator should have been suppressed as the fruits of that illegal search. We conclude that the court properly denied that part of defendant's omnibus motion seeking to suppress the physical evidence and statements.

In March 2010, defendant attempted to enter the Hall of Justice in Rochester. The security measures at the Hall of Justice required that all entrants be searched via metal detectors, and that their personal belongings pass through an X–ray machine to search for weapons and other contraband. During his entry to the Hall of Justice, defendant set off the walk-through magnetometer, and a subsequent scan of his person by a hand scanner operated by a Monroe County Sheriff's Deputy indicated that there was metal in the area of

8 N.Y.S.3d 790

defendant's crotch. When asked if he had any metal on his person, defendant gave an illogical and unlikely explanation, and began to act in a nervous manner. Defendant was scanned twice more by the hand scanner, which continued to indicate the presence of metal in the same location inside defendant's pants. After a pat frisk revealed no observable weapon on defendant's person, defendant was handcuffed and escorted to an adjacent private room by two deputies. There, one of the deputies helped defendant pull down his pants “just below the waist area,” and a “gold-covered foil package” containing drugs was retrieved from a seam in defendant's long underwear.

The evidence at the suppression hearing established that prospective entrants into the Hall of Justice were warned by postings that “anybody entering the building [was] subject to be[ing] searched,” and that, prior to submitting to the security procedures, defendant would have been able to see individuals

128 A.D.3d 1459

in line ahead of him passing through the magnetometer and placing their belongings on the X–ray machine. Thus, inasmuch as defendant had notice of the impending security checkpoint and search, we conclude that he relinquished any reasonable expectation of privacy and impliedly consented to the search by seeking entry into the Hall of Justice...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • People v. Griffin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • November 20, 2020
    ...as defendant failed to raise it in his omnibus motion or before the suppression court (see generally People v. White , 128 A.D.3d 1457, 1459, 8 N.Y.S.3d 788 [4th Dept. 2015], lv denied 26 N.Y.3d 1012, 20 N.Y.S.3d 553, 42 N.E.3d 223 [2015] ). We decline to exercise our power to review that c......
  • People v. Reibel, 1242
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 13, 2020
  • People v. Almeida
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 8, 2015
    ...v. Fernandez, 304 A.D.2d 504, 504–505, 758 N.Y.S.2d 329, lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 620, 767 N.Y.S.2d 403, 799 N.E.2d 626 ; see generally 8 N.Y.S.3d 788People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490, 495, 515 N.Y.S.2d 761, 508 N.E.2d 672 ). There was testimony that the victim sustained 33 stab wounds, severa......
  • People v. Wallace
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 29, 2017
    ...v. Feliciano, 140 A.D.3d 1776, 1777, 32 N.Y.S.3d 435lv. denied 28 N.Y.3d 1027, 45 N.Y.S.3d 379, 68 N.E.3d 108 ; People v. White, 128 A.D.3d 1457, 1460, 8 N.Y.S.3d 788, lv. denied 26 N.Y.3d 1012, 20 N.Y.S.3d 553, 42 N.E.3d 223 ; cf. People v. Mobley, 120 A.D.3d 916, 919, 991 N.Y.S.2d 193 ). ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT