People v. White

Decision Date06 September 1961
Docket NumberCr. 3196
Citation195 Cal.App.2d 389,15 Cal.Rptr. 665
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
PartiesPEOPLE of the State of California, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lynn WHITE, Defendant and Respondent.

David R. York, Dist. Atty., by Wade N. Shifflett, Deputy Dist. Atty., Napa, and Stanley Mosk, Atty. Gen., by John Foran, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellant.

Ellis R. Randall, Vallejo, for respondent.

SCHOTTKY, Justice.

Defendant, Lynn White, was charged with assault upon one Gordon Pfeil by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury. Pen.Code, sec. 245. Following a preliminary examination he was held to answer before the superior court and thereafter an information was filed charging that defendant did wilfully, unlawfully and feloniously commit an assault on Gordon Pfeil by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury in violation of section 245 of the Penal Code.

Defendant made a motion to set aside the information on the ground that he had been committed without reasonable or probable cause. The superior court granted the motion and dismissed the information. The People have appealed from the order of dismissal and contend most earnestly that the order was erroneous.

Before discussing this contention, we think it well to set forth certain well-settled principles applicable to the instant appeal which are well stated in People v. Platt, 124 Cal.App.2d 123, at page 130, 268 P.2d 529 at page 534, as follows:

'The evidence necessary to justify an order holding a defendant to answer to the superior court is not subject to the same test as that before a trial jury in a criminal action, and reasonable or probable cause may be found for holding to answer although the evidence does not establish the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. All that is required is a reasonable probability of the defendant's guilt. Davis v. Superior Court, 78 Cal.App.2d 25, 27, 177 P.2d 314. 'Reasonable or probable cause', required to uphold the commitment of a defendant, Pen.Code, sec. 995, exists if there is sufficient proof to make it reasonable to believe that the defendant is guilty of the offense charged. People v. George, 95 Cal.App.2d 425, 429, 213 P.2d 33; People v. Thomas, 90 Cal.App.2d 491, 494, 203 P.2d 567.

'On a motion to set aside an information, the question of the guilt or innocence of the defendant is not before the court, nor does the issue concern the quantum of evidence necessary to sustain a judgment of conviction. The court is only to determine whether the magistrate, acting as a man of ordinary caution or prudence, could conscientiously entertain a reasonable suspicion that a public offense had been committed in which the defendant had participated. Weber v. Superior Court, 35 Cal.2d 68, 69, 216 P.2d 871. * * *'

The record of the preliminary examination discloses that on November 11, 1960, Gordon Pfeil drove his car into the Midway Garage which is located on the Napa-Vallejo highway near the entrance to Rancho Del Mar. He stopped near the gas pumps and got out of his car to have the attendant repair a headlight. At this time Lynn White came up to him and asked why he had cut him off when he turned into the gas station. Pfeil told White that to the best of his knowledge he had not cut White off but that if he had he was sorry. White replied that the next time it happened he would run his truck over Pfeil's car. Pfeil then said that this would not be a wise thing to do and considered the conversation at an end. He took off his glasses because it was raining and leaned on the hood of his car. The next thing he knew he was hit in the eye. The blow was struck by White. As a result of the blow Pfeil had a highly discolored left eye, a cut in the eyebrow which required three stitches and a fractured cheek bone.

Section 245 of the Penal Code...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • People v. Wingo
    • United States
    • California Supreme Court
    • May 9, 1975
    ...force likely to produce great bodily injury. (People v. Chavez (1968) 268 Cal.App.2d 381, 384, 73 Cal.Rptr. 865; People v. White (1961) 195 Cal.App.2d 389, 15 Cal.Rptr. 665.) Moreover, since the statute focuses on force Likely to produce harm, it is immaterial that the force actually result......
  • Russi v. Superior Court
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • June 29, 1973
    ...beyond a reasonable doubt. All that is required is a reasonable probability of the defendant's guilt . . ." (People v. White (1961) 195 Cal.App.2d 389, 390--391, 15 Cal.Rptr. 665.) On a motion to set aside an information, the question of the guilt or innocence of the defendant is not before......
  • People v. B.M. (In re B.M.)
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • March 27, 2013
    ...Mansour was vulnerable, and unprepared to protect himself from the surprise, violent attack by multiple perpetrators. (People v. White (1961) 195 Cal.App.2d 389, 391-392.) He was grabbed without provocation around the neck and shoulders, thrown to the street with enough force to hurl his gl......
  • People v. Davis
    • United States
    • California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • February 13, 1996
    ...the class of deadly weapons or instruments. (See, for example, People v. Hinshaw, 194 Cal. 1, 22, 27, 227 P. 156; People v. White, 195 Cal.App.2d 389, 392, 15 Cal.Rptr. 665; 1 Witkin, Cal.Crimes, pp. 255-256.) Use of force likely to produce great bodily harm is not a determinative factor in......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT