People v. Wicks

Decision Date14 April 2011
Citation920 N.Y.S.2d 488,83 A.D.3d 1223,2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 02976
PartiesThe PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Albert H. WICKS, Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Salvatore C. Adamo, Albany, for appellant.

Kathleen B. Hogan, District Attorney, Lake George (Emilee B. Davenport of counsel), for respondent.

Before: PETERS, J.P., ROSE, LAHTINEN, MALONE JR. and GARRY, JJ.

MALONE JR., J.

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Warren County (Hall Jr., J.), rendered February 4, 2010, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of driving while intoxicated.

Defendant waived indictment and agreed to be prosecuted by a superior court information, charging him with driving while intoxicated. Defendant pleaded guilty as charged and waived his right to appeal. Pursuant to the plea agreement, defendant agreed to successfully complete a one-year period of interim probation. During the period of interim probation, defendant was required to complete a rehabilitation program and participate in the Warren County Treatment Court. If successful, it was understood that, at the conclusion of the one-year probation period, defendant would be sentenced to five years of probation. It was further understood that if defendant failed to successfully complete the required programs, he would be subject to a prison sentence of 2 1/3 to seven years. Defendant executed a written consent to these conditions during the plea proceedings. After defendant was discharged from his rehabilitation program for noncompliance and theft of services, he was found in violation of the terms of the agreement and County Court imposed a sentence of 2 to 6 years in prison. Defendant now appeals and we affirm.

Contrary to defendant's contention, we conclude that he voluntarily, knowingly and intelligently waived his right to appeal. The record reveals that County Court distinguished the right to appeal from the rights that he was forfeiting by his guilty plea. Defendant thereafter signed a written waiver in open court which acknowledged that counsel had explained its consequences to him and that he was waiving the right voluntarily. Accordingly, defendant validly waived his right to appeal ( see People v. Abrams, 75 A.D.3d 927, 927, 904 N.Y.S.2d 822 [2010],lv. denied15 N.Y.3d 918, 913 N.Y.S.2d 645, 939 N.E.2d 811 [2010];People v. Thomas, 71 A.D.3d 1231, 1231–1232, 896 N.Y.S.2d 264 [2010],lv. denied14 N.Y.3d 893, 903 N.Y.S.2d 781, 929 N.E.2d 1016 [2010] ).

Although defendant's contention that his plea was not voluntarily entered survives his appeal waiver, it is unpreserved for our review in light of defendant's failure to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Davis, 74 A.D.3d 1490, 1490, 903 N.Y.S.2d 756 [2010],lvs. denied15 N.Y.3d 850, 909 N.Y.S.2d 27, 28, 935 N.E.2d 819, 820 [2010];People v. Singh, 73 A.D.3d 1384, 1384–1385, 901 N.Y.S.2d 428 [2010],lv. denied15 N.Y.3d 809, 908 N.Y.S.2d 169, 934 N.E.2d 903 [2010] ). Moreover, defendant did not make any statements during the plea allocution that tended to negate an essential element of the crime or cast doubt upon his guilt, makingthe narrow exception to the preservation rule inapplicable ( see People v. Lopez, 71 N.Y.2d 662, 666, 529 N.Y.S.2d 465, 525 N.E.2d 5 [1988];People v. Bridge, 71 A.D.3d 1197, 1198, 895 N.Y.S.2d 260 [2010] ).

Defendant also contends that counsel's failure to make a suppression motion deprived him of the effective assistance of counsel. To the extent that he claims that this failure affected the voluntariness of his plea, such contention survives his waiver of the right to appeal, but is precluded from our review by his failure to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction ( see People v. Belle, 74 A.D.3d 1477, 1480, 902 N.Y.S.2d 258 [2010],lv....

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • People v. Chaney
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • April 26, 2018
    ...Hall, 147 A.D.3d 1151, 1152, 47 N.Y.S.3d 147 [2017], lv denied 29 N.Y.3d 1080, 64 N.Y.S.3d 170, 86 N.E.3d 257 [2017] ; People v. Wicks, 83 A.D.3d 1223, 1225, 920 N.Y.S.2d 488 [2011], lv denied 17 N.Y.3d 810, 929 N.Y.S.2d 570, 953 N.E.2d 808 [2011] ). As defendant could have raised this issu......
  • People v. Cassara
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 20, 2011
    ...to move to withdraw his plea or vacate the judgment of conviction, rendering the issue unpreserved for our review ( see People v. Wicks, 83 A.D.3d 1223, 1224, 920 N.Y.S.2d 488 [2011]; People v. De Berardinis, 304 A.D.2d 914, 915, 757 N.Y.S.2d 641 [2003], lv. denied 100 N.Y.2d 580, 764 N.Y.S......
  • People v. Cooper, 105659
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 5, 2015
    ...extent that this claim implicates the voluntariness of his plea and thus survives his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v. Wicks, 83 A.D.3d 1223, 1225, 920 N.Y.S.2d 488 [2011], lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 810, 929 N.Y.S.2d 570, 953 N.E.2d 808 [2011] ), it is nevertheless unpreserved for ap......
  • People v. Carpenter
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 8, 2012
    ...statements during the plea allocution that cast doubt upon his guilt or negated a material element of the crime ( see People v. Wicks, 83 A.D.3d 1223, 1224–1225, 920 N.Y.S.2d 488 [2011], lv. denied 17 N.Y.3d 810, 929 N.Y.S.2d 570, 953 N.E.2d 808 [2011] ). Defendant's contention that he was ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT