People v. Williams
| Decision Date | 25 April 1994 |
| Parties | The PEOPLE, etc., Respondent, v. Milton WILLIAMS, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
John M. Leventhal, Brooklyn, for appellant.
Charles J. Hynes, Dist. Atty., Brooklyn (Roseann B. MacKechnie, Seth M. Leiberman and Rodney Dent, of counsel), for respondent.
Before SULLIVAN, J.P., and O'BRIEN, GOLDSTEIN and FLORIO, JJ.
MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Fertig, J.), rendered December 18, 1991, convicting him of assault in the third degree and resisting arrest, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the People failed to prove that the complainant had suffered "physical injury" within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00(9). However, viewing the evidence adduced at the trial in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v. Contes, 60 N.Y.2d 620, 467 N.Y.S.2d 349, 454 N.E.2d 932), we find that it was legally sufficient to support the jury's finding of physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00(9). The complainant testified that she was hit and choked and "saw stars". She had a red mark and swelling next to her left eye which lasted approximately one week. The complainant also testified that her face was "very sore" for a week after the incident. The police officer who responded to the incident testified that the complainant looked like she had been in a fight and that she had bruises on her face. The doctor who had examined the complainant on the date of the incident testified that the complainant had a swollen and black and blue left temple that was tender to the touch. The hospital record was admitted into evidence. Photographs of the complainant taken on the date of the incident were admitted into evidence and showed these injuries. This evidence was sufficient to establish "physical injury" as defined by Penal Law § 10.00(9) (see, People v. Messier, 191 A.D.2d 819, 594 N.Y.S.2d 453; Matter of Andre D., 182 A.D.2d 1108, 582 N.Y.S.2d 890; People v. Bailey, 178 A.D.2d 846, 577 N.Y.S.2d 904; People v. Nix, 156 A.D.2d 722, 549 N.Y.S.2d 476; People v. Murray, 156 A.D.2d 722, 549 N.Y.S.2d 475; People v. Grimsley, 156 A.D.2d 714, 549 N.Y.S.2d 467).
Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15[5].
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Boyd
...279 A.D.2d 701, 703, 719 N.Y.S.2d 186 [2001],lv. denied96 N.Y.2d 797, 726 N.Y.S.2d 375, 750 N.E.2d 77 [2001];People v. Williams, 203 A.D.2d 608, 608, 610 N.Y.S.2d 613 [1994],lv. denied83 N.Y.2d 973, 616 N.Y.S.2d 26, 639 N.E.2d 766 [1994];People v. Gray, 189 A.D.2d 922, 923, 592 N.Y.S.2d 814......
-
People v. Carson
...748 ; People v. Gerecke, 34 A.D.3d 1260, 1261, 823 N.Y.S.2d 797 ; People v. Reid, 29 A.D.3d 712, 814 N.Y.S.2d 267 ; People v. Williams, 203 A.D.2d 608, 610 N.Y.S.2d 613 ). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15(5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt as to assau......
-
People v. Callaghan
...that the victim did not suffer a physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law §§ 10.00(9) and 120.00 (see, e.g., People v. Williams, 203 A.D.2d 608, 610 N.Y.S.2d 613; People v. Moise, 199 A.D.2d 423, 605 N.Y.S.2d 345; People v. Bailey, 176 A.D.2d 809, 575 N.Y.S.2d 328; People v. Crews, 1......
-
Gregory B., Matter of
...as well as a surgeon for his damaged nose (see, e.g., People v. Rogers, 138 A.D.2d 419, 525 N.Y.S.2d 702; see also, People v. Williams, 203 A.D.2d 608, 610 N.Y.S.2d 613; Matter of Andre D., 182 A.D.2d 1108, 582 N.Y.S.2d 890; People v. Lundquist, 151 A.D.2d 505, 507, 542 N.Y.S.2d 295; Penal ......